These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27200418)

  • 1. The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge.
    Huang W; Chen Y; Fedorov A; Li X; Jajamovich GH; Malyarenko DI; Aryal MP; LaViolette PS; Oborski MJ; O'Sullivan F; Abramson RG; Jafari-Khouzani K; Afzal A; Tudorica A; Moloney B; Gupta SN; Besa C; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Mountz JM; Laymon CM; Muzi M; Schmainda K; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Taouli B; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy F; Li X
    Tomography; 2016 Mar; 2(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 27200418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge, Part II.
    Huang W; Chen Y; Fedorov A; Li X; Jajamovich GH; Malyarenko DI; Aryal MP; LaViolette PS; Oborski MJ; O'Sullivan F; Abramson RG; Jafari-Khouzani K; Afzal A; Tudorica A; Moloney B; Gupta SN; Besa C; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Mountz JM; Laymon CM; Muzi M; Kinahan PE; Schmainda K; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Taouli B; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy F; Li X
    Tomography; 2019 Mar; 5(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 30854447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative sensitivities of DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters to arterial input function (AIF) scaling.
    Li X; Cai Y; Moloney B; Chen Y; Huang W; Woods M; Coakley FV; Rooney WD; Garzotto MG; Springer CS
    J Magn Reson; 2016 Aug; 269():104-112. PubMed ID: 27288764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
    Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variations of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of breast cancer therapy response: a multicenter data analysis challenge.
    Huang W; Li X; Chen Y; Li X; Chang MC; Oborski MJ; Malyarenko DI; Muzi M; Jajamovich GH; Fedorov A; Tudorica A; Gupta SN; Laymon CM; Marro KI; Dyvorne HA; Miller JV; Barbodiak DP; Chenevert TL; Yankeelov TE; Mountz JM; Kinahan PE; Kikinis R; Taouli B; Fennessy F; Kalpathy-Cramer J
    Transl Oncol; 2014 Feb; 7(1):153-66. PubMed ID: 24772219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
    Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.
    Rata M; Collins DJ; Darcy J; Messiou C; Tunariu N; Desouza N; Young H; Leach MO; Orton MR
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26385804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer: A systematic comparison of different modelling approaches.
    Kåstad Høiskar M; Sæther O; Delange Alsaker M; Røe Redalen K; Winter RM
    Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2024 Jan; 29():100548. PubMed ID: 38380153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
    Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.
    Mazaheri Y; Kim N; Lakhman Y; Jafari R; Vargas A; Otazo R
    NMR Biomed; 2022 Jul; 35(7):e4718. PubMed ID: 35226774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of contrast agent injection duration on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI quantification in prostate cancer.
    Klawer EME; van Houdt PJ; Pos FJ; Heijmink SWTPJ; van Osch MJP; van der Heide UA
    NMR Biomed; 2018 Sep; 31(9):e3946. PubMed ID: 29974981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Operator dependency of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Kleppestø M; Bjørnerud A; Groote IR; Kim M; Vardal J; Larsson C
    MAGMA; 2022 Feb; 35(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 34213687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of arterial input function selection on kinetic parameters in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Keil VC; Mädler B; Gieseke J; Fimmers R; Hattingen E; Schild HH; Hadizadeh DR
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 40():83-90. PubMed ID: 28438713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of artery input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for determining grades of gliomas.
    Jia L; Wu X; Wan Q; Wan L; Jia W; Zhang N
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20200699. PubMed ID: 33332981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of arterial input function (AIF) on quantitative prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and zonal prostate anatomy.
    Ziayee F; Müller-Lutz A; Gross J; Quentin M; Ullrich T; Heusch P; Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Wittsack HJ; Schimmöller L
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 53():28-33. PubMed ID: 29902565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Average arterial input function for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of neck nodal metastases.
    Shukla-Dave A; Lee N; Stambuk H; Wang Y; Huang W; Thaler HT; Patel SG; Shah JP; Koutcher JA
    BMC Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 9():4. PubMed ID: 19351382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis.
    Mehrabian H; Da Rosa M; Haider MA; Martel AL
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 26297961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved repeatability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using the complex MRI signal to derive arterial input functions: a test-retest study in prostate cancer patients.
    Klawer EME; van Houdt PJ; Simonis FFJ; van den Berg CAT; Pos FJ; Heijmink SWTPJ; Isebaert S; Haustermans K; van der Heide UA
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 May; 81(5):3358-3369. PubMed ID: 30656738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phase-based arterial input function measurements in the femoral arteries for quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and comparison with DCE-CT.
    Korporaal JG; van den Berg CA; van Osch MJ; Groenendaal G; van Vulpen M; van der Heide UA
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Nov; 66(5):1267-74. PubMed ID: 21604291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the Reliability of Pharmacokinetic Parameters at Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Astrocytomas: A Deep Learning Approach.
    Choi KS; You SH; Han Y; Ye JC; Jeong B; Choi SH
    Radiology; 2020 Oct; 297(1):178-188. PubMed ID: 32749203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.