These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Research funding: Making the cut. Powell K Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7314):383-5. PubMed ID: 20864969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat. Bentley P Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Checklists work to improve science. Nature; 2018 Apr; 556(7701):273-274. PubMed ID: 30967653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Interviews: Big ideas for better science. Powell K Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7583):589-90. PubMed ID: 26709403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Sitting in judgement. Check E Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Double-blind review: easy to guess in specialist fields. Lane D Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. How will you judge me if not by impact factor? Tregoning J Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7710):345. PubMed ID: 29921857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Swift publication would reward good reviewers. Koonin EV Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6930):374. PubMed ID: 12660754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]