These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27200447)

  • 41. Supporting the future.
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):958. PubMed ID: 18563096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Research funding: Making the cut.
    Powell K
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7314):383-5. PubMed ID: 20864969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat.
    Bentley P
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Checklists work to improve science.
    Nature; 2018 Apr; 556(7701):273-274. PubMed ID: 30967653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Interviews: Big ideas for better science.
    Powell K
    Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7583):589-90. PubMed ID: 26709403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sitting in judgement.
    Check E
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Citation rate unrelated to journals' impact factors.
    Waheed AA
    Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6966):495. PubMed ID: 14654813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The trouble with replication.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Recognition: Build a reputation.
    Woolston C
    Nature; 2015 May; 521(7550):113-5. PubMed ID: 25961086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Improving science through online commentary.
    Eagleman DM; Holcombe AO
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6935):15. PubMed ID: 12721598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Double-blind review: easy to guess in specialist fields.
    Lane D
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. How will you judge me if not by impact factor?
    Tregoning J
    Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7710):345. PubMed ID: 29921857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Swift publication would reward good reviewers.
    Koonin EV
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6930):374. PubMed ID: 12660754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. EURYI: present procedure risks conflicts of interest.
    Lente G
    Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7056):192. PubMed ID: 16148909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Not-so-deep impact.
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7045):1003-4. PubMed ID: 15973362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Enemy of the good.
    Nature; 2013 Nov; 503(7477):438. PubMed ID: 24298564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. No researcher is too junior to fix science.
    Tregoning J
    Nature; 2017 May; 545(7652):7. PubMed ID: 28470218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Model mentors.
    Dennis C; Wright J
    Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7121):966-8. PubMed ID: 17203554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Future impact: Predicting scientific success.
    Acuna DE; Allesina S; Kording KP
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):201-2. PubMed ID: 22972278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Impact factors aren't top journals' sole attraction.
    Törnqvist TE
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480. PubMed ID: 12774096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.