106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2720052)
1. Analysis of multiple tumor data from a rodent carcinogenicity experiment.
Finkelstein DM; Schoenfeld DA
Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):219-30. PubMed ID: 2720052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling the effect of dose on the lifetime tumor rate from an animal carcinogenicity experiment.
Finkelstein DM
Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):669-80. PubMed ID: 1912266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of false positive rates of peto and poly-3 methods for long-term carcinogenicity data analysis using multiple comparison adjustment method suggested by Lin and Rahman.
Rahman MA; Lin KK
J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(5):949-58. PubMed ID: 18781527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of animal carcinogenicity experiments with multiple tumor types.
Lu Y; Malani HM
Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 7766797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Constant risk differences in the analysis of animal tumorigenicity data.
Dinse GE
Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):681-700. PubMed ID: 1912267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Bayesian approach to the multiplicity problem for significance testing with binomial data.
Meng CY; Dempster AP
Biometrics; 1987 Jun; 43(2):301-11. PubMed ID: 3607202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Global tests for analysis of multiple tumour data from animal carcinogenicity experiments.
Chen JJ
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(11):1217-25. PubMed ID: 8804149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of k for the poly-k test with application to animal carcinogenicity studies.
Moon H; Ahn H; Kodell RL; Lee JJ
Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(16):2619-36. PubMed ID: 12898548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of associations between diseases in animal carcinogenicity experiments.
Mitchell TJ; Turnbull BW
Biometrics; 1990 Jun; 46(2):359-74. PubMed ID: 2364126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical analysis of animal cancer chemoprevention experiments.
Freedman LS; Midthune DN; Brown CC; Steele V; Kelloff GJ
Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):259-68. PubMed ID: 8513108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of 5,5-Diphenylhydantoin (CAS No. 57-41-0) (Phenytoin) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Feed Studies).
National Toxicology Program
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 1993 Nov; 404():1-303. PubMed ID: 12621514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical methods for the analysis of tumor multiplicity data.
Drinkwater NR; Klotz JH
Cancer Res; 1981 Jan; 41(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 7448751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of treatment-induced mortality and tumor-induced mortality on tests for carcinogenicity in small samples.
Bailer AJ; Portier CJ
Biometrics; 1988 Jun; 44(2):417-31. PubMed ID: 3390507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An age-adjusted bootstrap-based Poly-k test.
Moon H; Ahn H; Kodell RL
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1233-44. PubMed ID: 15573413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ratio estimates, the delta method, and quantal response tests for increased carcinogenicity.
Bieler GS; Williams RL
Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):793-801. PubMed ID: 8241374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The statistical analysis of cancer inhibition/promotion experiments.
Kokoska SM; Hardin JM; Grubbs CJ; Hsu C
Anticancer Res; 1993; 13(5A):1357-63. PubMed ID: 8239506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. NTP carcinogenesis studies of 2,2-bis(bromomethyl)-1,3-propanediol, nitromethane, and 1,2,3-trichloropropane (cas nos. 3296-90-0, 75-52-5, and 96-18-4) in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) and medaka (Oryzias latipes) (Waterborne Studies).
National Toxicology Program
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2005 Oct; (528):1-190. PubMed ID: 16362062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Issues in the design and interpretation of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies in rodents: approaches to dose selection.
Rhomberg LR; Baetcke K; Blancato J; Bus J; Cohen S; Conolly R; Dixit R; Doe J; Ekelman K; Fenner-Crisp P; Harvey P; Hattis D; Jacobs A; Jacobson-Kram D; Lewandowski T; Liteplo R; Pelkonen O; Rice J; Somers D; Turturro A; West W; Olin S
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007; 37(9):729-837. PubMed ID: 17957539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
