These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2720053)

  • 1. On testing departure from the binomial and multinomial assumptions.
    Paul SR; Liang KY; Self SG
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):231-6. PubMed ID: 2720053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of multinomial and binomial proportion methods for analysis of multinomial count data.
    Galyean ML; Wester DB
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3452-63. PubMed ID: 20601524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misspecification tests for binomial and beta-binomial models.
    Capanu M; Presnell B
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2536-54. PubMed ID: 17914713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the chi-square approximation to the exact distribution of goodness-of-fit statistics in multinomial models with composite hypotheses.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón VA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 May; 57(Pt 1):73-96. PubMed ID: 15171802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bootstrap tests for overdispersion in a zero-inflated Poisson regression model.
    Jung BC; Jhun M; Lee JW
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):626-8; discussion 628-9. PubMed ID: 16011713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the significance of the correlation between two spatial processes.
    Clifford P; Richardson S; Hémon D
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 2720048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing a genetic equilibrium across strata.
    Nam JM
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Mar; 61(Pt 2):163-70. PubMed ID: 9177123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing the ratio of two poisson rates.
    Gu K; Ng HK; Tang ML; Schucany WR
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18311854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Monte Carlo investigation of homogeneity tests of the odds ratio under various sample size configurations.
    Jones MP; O'Gorman TW; Lemke JH; Woolson RF
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):171-81. PubMed ID: 2720050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing nonlinear regression parameters under heteroscedastic, normally distributed errors.
    Kimura DK
    Biometrics; 1990 Sep; 46(3):697-708. PubMed ID: 2242410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A likelihood ratio statistic for testing goodness of fit with randomly censored data.
    Turnbull BW; Weiss L
    Biometrics; 1978 Sep; 34(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 719120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A nonparametric smoothing method for assessing GEE models with longitudinal binary data.
    Lin KC; Chen YJ; Shyr Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4428-39. PubMed ID: 18613210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing approaches for overdispersion in poisson regression versus the generalized poisson model.
    Yang Z; Hardin JW; Addy CL; Vuong QH
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):565-84. PubMed ID: 17638291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Monte Carlo evaluation of three statistical methods used in path analysis.
    McGue M; Wette R; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(2):129-55. PubMed ID: 3582958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kappa as an index of reproducibility: distribution under the null-hypothesis.
    Mazoyer B; Mary JY
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1987; 35(6):474-81. PubMed ID: 3441658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian chi-squared goodness-of-fit test for censored data models.
    Cao J; Moosman A; Johnson VE
    Biometrics; 2010 Jun; 66(2):426-34. PubMed ID: 19645701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A spatial scan statistic for ordinal data.
    Jung I; Kulldorff M; Klassen AC
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1594-607. PubMed ID: 16795130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.