These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27203298)

  • 1. Elective single embryo transfer: Is frozen better than fresh?
    Gomaa H; Baydoun R; Sachak S; Lapana I; Soliman S
    JBRA Assist Reprod; 2016 Mar; 20(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 27203298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40-44 years.
    Niinimäki M; Suikkari AM; Mäkinen S; Söderström-Anttila V; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 23175499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.
    Min JK; Hughes E; Young D; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):363-377. PubMed ID: 20500945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
    Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The presence of multiple gestational sacs confers a higher live birth rate in women with infertility who achieve a positive pregnancy test after fresh and frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective local cohort.
    Balassiano E; Malik S; Vaid P; Knochenhauer ES; Traub ML
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2014 Nov; 12():104. PubMed ID: 25422171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of live birth following assisted reproduction: an analysis of 85,062 fresh and thawed cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012-2013.
    Tal R; Seifer DB; Wantman E; Baker V; Tal O
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 29331235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient and cycle characteristics predicting high pregnancy rates with single-embryo transfer: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology outcomes between 2004 and 2013.
    Mersereau J; Stanhiser J; Coddington C; Jones T; Luke B; Brown MB
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):750-756. PubMed ID: 28923285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Embryo quality is the main factor affecting cumulative live birth rate after elective single embryo transfer in fresh stimulation cycles.
    Niinimäki M; Veleva Z; Martikainen H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov; 194():131-5. PubMed ID: 26366790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of ectopic pregnancy lowest with transfer of single frozen blastocyst.
    Li Z; Sullivan EA; Chapman M; Farquhar C; Wang YA
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2048-54. PubMed ID: 26202917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.
    Styer AK; Luke B; Vitek W; Christianson MS; Baker VL; Christy AY; Polotsky AJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 26997248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fresh transfer outcome predicts the success of a subsequent frozen transfer utilizing blastocysts of the same cohort.
    Doherty LF; Martin JR; Kayisli U; Sakkas D; Patrizio P
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Feb; 28(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 24365019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of biochemical pregnancy rates between women who underwent IVF and fertile controls who conceived spontaneously†.
    Zeadna A; Son WY; Moon JH; Dahan MH
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Apr; 30(4):783-8. PubMed ID: 25678573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years.
    Veleva Z; Vilska S; Hydén-Granskog C; Tiitinen A; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2098-102. PubMed ID: 16740524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
    Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
    Veleva Z; Orava M; Nuojua-Huttunen S; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2425-31. PubMed ID: 23756705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro maturation as an alternative to standard in vitro fertilization for patients diagnosed with polycystic ovaries: a comparative analysis of fresh, frozen and cumulative cycle outcomes.
    Walls ML; Hunter T; Ryan JP; Keelan JA; Nathan E; Hart RJ
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Jan; 30(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 25355587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards single embryo transfer? Modelling clinical outcomes of potential treatment choices using multiple data sources: predictive models and patient perspectives.
    Roberts S; McGowan L; Hirst W; Brison D; Vail A; Lieberman B
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jul; 14(38):1-237. PubMed ID: 20684810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Economic evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer with subsequent single frozen embryo transfer in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection program.
    Hernandez Torres E; Navarro-Espigares JL; Clavero A; López-Regalado M; Camacho-Ballesta JA; Onieva-García M; Martínez L; Castilla JA
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Mar; 103(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 25557244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.