BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27203362)

  • 1. Comparison of impedance measurements near the skin of newborns and adults.
    Amm B; Kao TJ; Newell J; Isaacson D; Saulnier G; Shoudy D; Boverman G; Sahni R; Weindler M; Chong D; DiBardino D; Davenport D; Ashe J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 27203362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison study of electrodes for neonate electrical impedance tomography.
    Rahal M; Khor JM; Demosthenous A; Tizzard A; Bayford R
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S73-84. PubMed ID: 19491443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of torso and arm positions on chest examinations by electrical impedance tomography.
    Vogt B; Mendes L; Chouvarda I; Perantoni E; Kaimakamis E; Becher T; Weiler N; Tsara V; Paiva RP; Maglaveras N; Frerichs I
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):904-21. PubMed ID: 27200486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrical impedance tomography in 3D using two electrode planes: characterization and evaluation.
    Wagenaar J; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):922-37. PubMed ID: 27203154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 3D EIT image reconstruction with GREIT.
    Grychtol B; Müller B; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):785-800. PubMed ID: 27203184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical performance of a novel textile interface for neonatal chest electrical impedance tomography.
    Sophocleous L; Frerichs I; Miedema M; Kallio M; Papadouri T; Karaoli C; Becher T; Tingay DG; van Kaam AH; Bayford R; Waldmann AD
    Physiol Meas; 2018 Apr; 39(4):044004. PubMed ID: 29516865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of different electrode belt positions on electrical impedance tomography imaging of regional ventilation: a prospective observational study.
    Karsten J; Stueber T; Voigt N; Teschner E; Heinze H
    Crit Care; 2016 Jan; 20():3. PubMed ID: 26743570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flexible electrode belt for EIT using nanofiber web dry electrodes.
    Oh TI; Kim TE; Yoon S; Kim KJ; Woo EJ; Sadleir RJ
    Physiol Meas; 2012 Oct; 33(10):1603-16. PubMed ID: 22945587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Apr; 40(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 8375870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-frequency EIT system with radially symmetric architecture: KHU Mark1.
    Oh TI; Woo EJ; Holder D
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S183-96. PubMed ID: 17664635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
    Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of different stimulation and measurement patterns based on internal electrode: application in cardiac impedance tomography.
    Nasehi Tehrani J; Oh TI; Jin C; Thiagalingam A; McEwan A
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Nov; 42(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 23017828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correction of electrode modelling errors in multi-frequency EIT imaging.
    Jehl M; Holder D
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):893-903. PubMed ID: 27206237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
    Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applications for Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) and Electrical Properties of the Human Body.
    Lymperopoulos G; Lymperopoulos P; Alikari V; Dafogianni C; Zyga S; Margari N
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2017; 989():109-117. PubMed ID: 28971420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-channel electrical impedance tomography for regional tissue hydration monitoring.
    Chen X; Kao TJ; Ashe JM; Boverman G; Sabatini JE; Davenport DM
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Jun; 35(6):1137-47. PubMed ID: 24845597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EIT image reconstruction based on a hybrid FE-EFG forward method and the complete-electrode model.
    Hadinia M; Jafari R; Soleimani M
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):863-78. PubMed ID: 27203801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shape deformation in two-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Boyle A; Adler A; Lionheart WR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2185-93. PubMed ID: 22711769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The application technique of electrical impedance tomography].
    Ren CS; Wang Y; Deng J
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 31(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 17969500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The contribution of the lungs to thoracic impedance measurements: a simulation study based on a high resolution finite difference model.
    Yang F; Patterson RP
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S153-61. PubMed ID: 17664633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.