These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. National survey of mammographic facilities in 1985, 1988, and 1992. Conway BJ; Suleiman OH; Rueter FG; Antonsen RG; Slayton RJ Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 8153301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The history and the effect of the mammography quality assurance legislation in Michigan. Osuch JR; Camburn JF; Sienko DG; Potchen EJ Cancer; 1994 Jul; 74(1 Suppl):263-70. PubMed ID: 8004596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A quality assurance programme for mass screening in mammography. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1989 Dec; 12(4):252-9. PubMed ID: 2610641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Strategies for implementation and quality assurance for mammographic screening. DeBruhl ND; Farria DM; Bassett LW Curr Opin Radiol; 1992 Oct; 4(5):155-9. PubMed ID: 1343948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. American College of Radiology (ACR). Mammography Accreditation Program: Guidelines. Wilcox PA Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co; 1991; 72(1):17. PubMed ID: 2011816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Standardization of image quality and radiation dose in mammography. Hendrick RE Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):648-54. PubMed ID: 2305044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Legislative and regulatory mandates for mammography quality assurance. Fintor L; Alciati MH; Fischer R J Public Health Policy; 1995; 16(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 7738160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Investigation of radiation quality and doses in Japanese routine mammography. Fujisaki T; Igarashi A; Takahashi S; Watanabe K; Nishimura K; Abe S; Saitoh H; Fukuda K; Matsumoto M Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jul; 62(8):436-41. PubMed ID: 12187840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Survey on image quality and dose levels used in Europe for mammography. Verdun FR; Moeckli R; Valley JF; Bochud F; Hessler C Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug; 69(824):762-8. PubMed ID: 8949680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quality of care and performance improvement. McLelland R N C Med J; 2005; 66(1):78-9. PubMed ID: 15786688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Quality assurance in mammography: College of Radiology Survey in Malaysia. Ho EL; Ng KH; Wong JH; Wang HB Med J Malaysia; 2006 Jun; 61(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 16898312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical physicists role under MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act). Haus AG Adm Radiol; 1994 Nov; 13(11):35-8. PubMed ID: 10139208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Meet high expectations for mammography with high-quality services. Linver M Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1998 Nov; 20(11):89-92, 97-8. PubMed ID: 10344867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Review of the first 50 cases completed by the RACR mammography QA programme: phantom image quality, processor control and dose considerations. McLean D; Eckert M; Heard R; Chan W Australas Radiol; 1997 Nov; 41(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 9409037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]