These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2720611)

  • 41. Inconsistencies in mammographic phantoms used for ACR Accreditation.
    Hendrick RE
    Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):581-3. PubMed ID: 1561375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Quality Controls in Digital Mammography protocol of the EFOMP Mammo Working group.
    Gennaro G; Avramova-Cholakova S; Azzalini A; Luisa Chapel M; Chevalier M; Ciraj O; de Las Heras H; Gershan V; Hemdal B; Keavey E; Lanconelli N; Menhart S; João Fartaria M; Pascoal A; Pedersen K; Rivetti S; Rossetti V; Semturs F; Sharp P; Torresin A
    Phys Med; 2018 Apr; 48():55-64. PubMed ID: 29728229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Quality assurance results from a breast screening pilot study.
    Thiele DL
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1991 Sep; 14(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 1953503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reasons for failure of a mammography unit at clinical image review in the American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program.
    Bassett LW; Farria DM; Bansal S; Farquhar MA; Wilcox PA; Feig SA
    Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):698-702. PubMed ID: 10831687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Quality assurance for screening mammography: an international comparison.
    Klabunde C; Bouchard F; Taplin S; Scharpantgen A; Ballard-Barbash R;
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2001 Mar; 55(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 11160176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Quality assurance breast phantoms for screen-film mammography: design and use.
    Stanton L; Villafana T
    Appl Radiol; 1989 Nov; 18(11):41-8. PubMed ID: 10304413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The economics of mammography quality assurance.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW
    Adm Radiol; 1989 Sep; 8(9):38-40. PubMed ID: 10294844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Updated Recommendations for MRI of the Breast.
    Breast Imaging Working Group of the German Radiological Society
    Rofo; 2014 May; 186(5):482-3. PubMed ID: 24756386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Reference levels for image quality in mammography.
    Zdesar U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Verdict on MQSA: quality up, but so is financial burden.
    Wagner SK
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Apr; 21(4):33-4, 62. PubMed ID: 10537785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of quality assurance regulatory enforcement on performance of mammography systems: evidence from large-scale surveys in Taiwan.
    Hwang YS; Tsai HY; Chen CC; Tsay PK; Pan HB; Hsu GC; Lin JH; Chui CS; Wan YL; Liu HL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W307-12. PubMed ID: 23883245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Mammography facilities must meet quality standards.
    Segal M
    FDA Consum; 1994 Mar; 28(2):8-12. PubMed ID: 10132985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. 1998 Mammography Quality Standards Act final rule: summary of new requirements.
    Hosp Technol Ser; 1997 Dec; 16(16):17-8. PubMed ID: 10187283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Confrontation of mammography systems in flanders with the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in mammography screening. Analysis of initial results.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Deprez T; Rogge F; Van Steen A; Van Limbergen E; Marchal G
    JBR-BTR; 1999 Dec; 82(6):288-93. PubMed ID: 10670170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Position paper: recommendations for a digital mammography quality assurance program V4.0.
    Heggie JCP; Barnes P; Cartwright L; Diffey J; Tse J; Herley J; McLean ID; Thomson FJ; Grewal RK; Collins LT
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Sep; 40(3):491-543. PubMed ID: 28914430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Technical quality control practices in mammography screening programs in 22 countries.
    Hendrick RE; Klabunde C; Grivegnee A; Pou G; Ballard-Barbash R
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Jun; 14(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 12108532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Canadian Association of Radiologists Mammography Accreditation Program spurs improved quality.
    Lévesque J
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2014 Aug; 65(3):194-5. PubMed ID: 24974361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of results from quality control of physical parameters and results from clinical evaluation of mammographic images for the mammography screening facilities in Poland.
    Fabiszewska E; Grabska I; Jankowska K; Wesolowska E; Bulski W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):206-9. PubMed ID: 21824870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. CAR ad hoc committee for mammography accreditation.
    Hutton LC
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1992 Jun; 43(3):168-9. PubMed ID: 1596758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.