These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2720611)

  • 61. Are current mammography quality standards act (MQSA) physician guidelines truly adequate?
    Melton AR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W79. PubMed ID: 18647894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act) update--focusing on quality assurance.
    Butler PF
    Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(4):40-50. PubMed ID: 10181471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Mammography quality assurance from A to Z.
    Farria DM; Bassett LW; Kimme-Smith C; DeBruhl N
    Radiographics; 1994 Mar; 14(2):371-85. PubMed ID: 8190960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Breast exposure: nationwide trends; a mammographic quality assurance program--results to date.
    Jensen JE; Butler PF
    Radiol Technol; 1978; 50(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 264140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Mammography processor quality assurance.
    Monda LA
    Radiol Technol; 2002; 74(1):46-68; quiz 69-72. PubMed ID: 12362534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. ACR standard for luminance and illuminance. American College of Radiology.
    Harpen MD; Green AE; Brogdon BG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Nov; 173(5):1411. PubMed ID: 10541132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. RAD-AID Asha Jyoti Mammogram Quality Assessment in India: Optimizing Mobile Radiology.
    Mango VL; Ha R; Nguyen B; Mema E; Kobeski J; Singh T; Khandelwal N
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Jul; 13(7):831-4. PubMed ID: 27162043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Automated daily quality control analysis for mammography in a multi-unit imaging center.
    Sundell VM; Mäkelä T; Meaney A; Kaasalainen T; Savolainen S
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Feb; 60(2):140-148. PubMed ID: 29768928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Problems with the American College of Radiology Standard for Diagnostic Mammography.
    Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1367-9. PubMed ID: 7484565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. [A program devoted to dose and quality in mammography (DQM)].
    Rimondi O; Gambaccini M; Indovina P; Candini G
    Radiol Med; 1986 Mar; 72(3):116-20. PubMed ID: 3704212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Problems with the Radiation Measurements Incorporated/American College of Radiology mammography accreditation phantom.
    Nikesch W
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(5):934. PubMed ID: 2233584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Mammography in the 1990s: the United States and Canada.
    Suleiman OH; Spelic DC; McCrohan JL; Symonds GR; Houn F
    Radiology; 1999 Feb; 210(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 10207413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Comparison of accreditation procedures, ISO 9000 certification procedures and total quality management. Personal experiences and application of quality assurance in a department of radiology and medical imaging].
    Duvauferrier R; Rolland Y; Philippe C; Milon J; de Korvin B; Rambeau M; Morcet N; Ramée A
    J Radiol; 1999 Apr; 80(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 10337574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. FDA's mammography facility quality assurance program.
    Kivel M
    Adm Radiol; 1994 Feb; 13(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 10132931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Professional quality assurance for mammography screening programs.
    Murphy WA; Destouet JM; Monsees BS
    Radiology; 1990 May; 175(2):319-20. PubMed ID: 2326453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Regulatory Compliance in Mammography.
    Loesch J
    Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(4):425M-442M; quiz 443M-444M. PubMed ID: 26952076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program.
    Barlow RE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Jul; 159(1):219-20. PubMed ID: 1609704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. [Quality criteria and quality control in mammography].
    Friedrich M
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1985; 123():63-75. PubMed ID: 2860867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Evaluation of equipment performance, patient dose, imaging quality, and diagnostic coincidence in five Mexico City mammography services.
    Brandan ME; Ruiz-Trejo C; Verdejo-Silva M; Guevara M; Lozano-Zalce H; Madero-Preciado L; Martín J; Noel-Etienne LM; Ramírez-Arias JL; Soto J; Villaseñor Y
    Arch Med Res; 2004; 35(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15036796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Report of the "ad hoc" committee on mammography rapport du comite "ad hoc" sur la mammographie.
    Léger JL; Naimark AP; Béique RA; McFarlane DV; Miller S; Miller AB
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1974 Mar; 25(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 4595875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.