402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27206284)
1. Validation of Revised FIGO Staging Classification for Cancer of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneum Based on a Single Histological Type.
Toptas T; Pestereli E; Erol O; Bozkurt S; Erdogan G; Simsek T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jul; 26(6):1012-9. PubMed ID: 27206284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. International Federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: estimation of survival in patients with node-positive epithelial ovarian cancer.
Pereira A; Pérez-Medina T; Magrina JF; Magtibay PM; Rodríguez-Tapia A; Peregrin I; Mendizabal E; Ortiz-Quintana L
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jan; 25(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25405578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Current FIGO staging classification for cancer of ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum].
Šišovská I; Minář L; Felsinger M; Anton M; Bednaříková M; Hausnerová J; Jandáková E; Weinberger V
Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(3):230-236. PubMed ID: 28593778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The new FIGO staging system for ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.
Zeppernick F; Meinhold-Heerlein I
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Nov; 290(5):839-42. PubMed ID: 25082067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Restaging and Survival Analysis of 4036 Ovarian Cancer Patients According to the 2013 FIGO Classification for Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer.
Rosendahl M; Høgdall CK; Mosgaard BJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 May; 26(4):680-7. PubMed ID: 26937751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lymph Node Involvement Pattern and Survival Differences of FIGO IIIC and FIGO IIIA1 Ovarian Cancer Patients After Primary Complete Tumor Debulking Surgery: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis of the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network.
Gasimli K; Braicu EI; Nassir M; Richter R; Babayeva A; Chekerov R; Darb-Esfahani S; Sehouli J; Muallem MZ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):1279-86. PubMed ID: 26832880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maximal cytoreduction in patients with FIGO stage IIIC to stage IV ovarian, fallopian, and peritoneal cancer in day-to-day practice: a Retrospective French Multicentric Study.
Luyckx M; Leblanc E; Filleron T; Morice P; Darai E; Classe JM; Ferron G; Stoeckle E; Pomel C; Vinet B; Chereau E; Bergzoll C; Querleu D
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1337-43. PubMed ID: 22964527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
Chi DS; Musa F; Dao F; Zivanovic O; Sonoda Y; Leitao MM; Levine DA; Gardner GJ; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jan; 124(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 21917306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A retrospective study for investigating the relationship between old and new staging systems with prognosis in ovarian cancer using gynecologic cancer registry of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG): disparity between serous carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma.
Yamagami W; Nagase S; Takahashi F; Ino K; Hachisuga T; Mikami M; Enomoto T; Katabuchi H; Aoki D
J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jul; 31(4):e45. PubMed ID: 32026659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of early-stage primary serous fallopian tube carcinomas and equivalent stage serous epithelial ovarian carcinomas.
Horng HC; Lai CR; Chang WH; Wen KC; Chen YJ; Juang CM; Yen MS; Wang PH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):547-51. PubMed ID: 25510699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Re-evaluation of interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer].
Ma Y; Li Y; Cui H; Liang XD; Tang ZJ; Li XP; Zhao Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 47(5):355-60. PubMed ID: 22883524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of ablation and ultrasonic aspiration at primary debulking surgery in advanced stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.
Li S; Manning-Geist B; Gockley A; Ramos A; Sisodia RC; Del Carmen M; Growdon WB; Horowitz N; Berkowitz R; Worley M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):1052-1057. PubMed ID: 32487686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Progression-free and overall survival of a modified outpatient regimen of primary intravenous/intraperitoneal paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.
Barlin JN; Dao F; Bou Zgheib N; Ferguson SE; Sabbatini PJ; Hensley ML; Bell-McGuinn KM; Konner J; Tew WP; Aghajanian C; Chi DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):621-4. PubMed ID: 22446622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The clinical impact of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma on outcomes of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum.
Toptas T; Pestereli E; Simsek T; Bozkurt S; Erdogan G; Karaveli S
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(3):587-592. PubMed ID: 29893323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A phase II trial of oxaliplatin, docetaxel, and bevacizumab as first-line therapy of advanced cancer of the ovary, peritoneum, and fallopian tube.
Herzog TJ; Monk BJ; Rose PG; Braly P; Hines JF; Bell MC; Wenham RM; Secord AA; Roman LD; Einstein MH; Drake RD; Childs BH
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Mar; 132(3):517-25. PubMed ID: 24476788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revised FIGO staging system for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: important implications for radiologists.
Saida T; Tanaka YO; Matsumoto K; Satoh T; Yoshikawa H; Minami M
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Feb; 34(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 26696400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Should All Cases of High-Grade Serous Ovarian, Tubal, and Primary Peritoneal Carcinomas Be Reclassified as Tubo-Ovarian Serous Carcinoma?
Moss EL; Evans T; Pearmain P; Askew S; Singh K; Chan KK; Ganesan R; Hirschowitz L
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Sep; 25(7):1201-7. PubMed ID: 26035124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive value of the Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index on perioperative complications and survival in patients undergoing primary debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
Suidan RS; Leitao MM; Zivanovic O; Gardner GJ; Long Roche KC; Sonoda Y; Levine DA; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Abu-Rustum NR; Charlson ME; Chi DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 138(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 26037900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic significance of systematic lymphadenectomy as part of primary debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Chang SJ; Bristow RE; Ryu HS
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 126(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 22609747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chemotherapy Response Score: Development and Validation of a System to Quantify Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma.
Böhm S; Faruqi A; Said I; Lockley M; Brockbank E; Jeyarajah A; Fitzpatrick A; Ennis D; Dowe T; Santos JL; Cook LS; Tinker AV; Le ND; Gilks CB; Singh N
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(22):2457-63. PubMed ID: 26124480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
