These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27206350)

  • 41. Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator.
    Freschi C; Ferrari V; Melfi F; Ferrari M; Mosca F; Cuschieri A
    Int J Med Robot; 2013 Dec; 9(4):396-406. PubMed ID: 23166047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Is smaller workspace a limitation for robot performance in laparoscopy?
    Thakre AA; Bailly Y; Sun LW; Van Meer F; Yeung CK
    J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):1138-42; discussion 1142-3. PubMed ID: 18206956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Development of a medical robot system for minimally invasive surgery.
    Feng M; Fu Y; Pan B; Liu C
    Int J Med Robot; 2012 Mar; 8(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 21990214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Initial experience with the four-arm computer-enhanced telesurgery device in foregut surgery.
    Newlin ME; Mikami DJ; Melvin SW
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2004 Jun; 14(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 15245661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An improved surgical instrument without coupled motions that can be used in robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery.
    Mei F; Yili F; Bo P; Xudong Z
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Aug; 226(8):623-30. PubMed ID: 23057235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Robot-assisted surgery for gastric cancer: experience at our institute.
    Isogaki J; Haruta S; Man-I M; Suda K; Kawamura Y; Yoshimura F; Kawabata T; Inaba K; Ishikawa K; Ishida Y; Taniguchi K; Sato S; Kanaya S; Uyama I
    Pathobiology; 2011; 78(6):328-33. PubMed ID: 22104204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of control modes of a hand-held robot for laparoscopic surgery.
    Tonet O; Focacci F; Piccigallo M; Cavallo F; Uematsu M; Megali G; Dario P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):429-36. PubMed ID: 17354919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Research of the master-slave robot surgical system with the function of force feedback.
    Shi Y; Zhou C; Xie L; Chen Y; Jiang J; Zhang Z; Deng Z
    Int J Med Robot; 2017 Dec; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 28513095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A semi-active milling procedure in view of preparing implantation beds in robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery.
    Van Ham G; Denis K; Vander Sloten J; Van Audekercke R; Van der Perre G; De Schutter J; Simon JP; Fabry G
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2005 May; 219(3):163-74. PubMed ID: 15934392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Training in robotic surgery using the da Vinci® surgical system for left pneumonectomy and lymph node dissection in an animal model.
    Kajiwara N; Kakihana M; Usuda J; Uchida O; Ohira T; Kawate N; Ikeda N
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011; 17(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 21881375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Optimization of a spherical mechanism for a minimally invasive surgical robot: theoretical and experimental approaches.
    Lum MJ; Rosen J; Sinanan MN; Hannaford B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1440-5. PubMed ID: 16830951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Simulation for optimal design of hand-held surgical robots.
    Zahraee AH; Szewczyk J; Morel G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():270-3. PubMed ID: 19963456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Improving robot arm control for safe and robust haptic cooperation in orthopaedic procedures.
    Cruces RA; Wahrburg J
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Dec; 3(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 17948919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Early experience with telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci.
    Kim VB; Chapman WH; Albrecht RJ; Bailey BM; Young JA; Nifong LW; Chitwood WR
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2002 Feb; 12(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 12008760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Initial clinical experience with a partly autonomous robotic surgical instrument server.
    Treat MR; Amory SE; Downey PE; Taliaferro DA
    Surg Endosc; 2006 Aug; 20(8):1310-4. PubMed ID: 16715211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Does robotic assistance improve efficiency in performing complex minimally invasive surgical procedures?
    Jayaraman S; Quan D; Al-Ghamdi I; El-Deen F; Schlachta CM
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Mar; 24(3):584-8. PubMed ID: 19633893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Design of multi-degrees-of-freedom dexterous modular arm instruments for minimally invasive surgery.
    Cepolina FE; Zoppi M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Nov; 226(11):827-37. PubMed ID: 23185953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Haptic tracking control for minimally invasive robotic surgery].
    Xu Z; Song C; Wu W
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 29(3):407-10. PubMed ID: 22826928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Robot-assisted anterior lumbar interbody fusion in a Swine model in vivo test of the da vinci surgical-assisted spinal surgery system.
    Yang MS; Yoon DH; Kim KN; Kim H; Yang JW; Yi S; Lee JY; Jung WJ; Rha KH; Ha Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(2):E139-43. PubMed ID: 20948463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Development and evaluation of a master-slave robot system for single-incision laparoscopic surgery.
    Horise Y; Nishikawa A; Sekimoto M; Kitanaka Y; Miyoshi N; Takiguchi S; Doki Y; Mori M; Miyazaki F
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2012 Mar; 7(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 21927865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.