These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27206993)

  • 21. Characterization of the frequency and muscle responses of the lumbar and thoracic spines of seated volunteers during sinusoidal whole body vibration.
    Baig HA; Dorman DB; Bulka BA; Shivers BL; Chancey VC; Winkelstein BA
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Oct; 136(10):101002. PubMed ID: 25010637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of support conditions on vertical whole-body vibration of the seated human body.
    M-Pranesh A; Rakheja S; Demont R
    Ind Health; 2010; 48(5):682-97. PubMed ID: 20953085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of phase on discomfort caused by vertical whole-body vibration and shock--experimental investigation.
    Matsumoto Y; Griffin MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1280-8. PubMed ID: 11931305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Apparent mass and seat-to-head transmissibility responses of seated occupants under single and dual axis horizontal vibration.
    Mandapuram S; Rakheja S; Boileau PÉ; Maeda S; Shibata N
    Ind Health; 2010; 48(5):698-714. PubMed ID: 20953086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of seating on the discomfort caused by mechanical shocks: Measurement and prediction of SEAT values.
    Patelli G; Griffin MJ
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():134-144. PubMed ID: 30487092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Finite element modelling of human-seat interactions: vertical in-line and fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass when sitting on a rigid seat without backrest and exposed to vertical vibration.
    Liu C; Qiu Y; Griffin MJ
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(7):1207-19. PubMed ID: 25716324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optimization of the contact damping and stiffness coefficients to minimize human body vibration.
    Amirouche FM; Xie M; Patwardhan A
    J Biomech Eng; 1994 Nov; 116(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 7869717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Biodynamic responses of the seated posture of human upper-body under horizontal and vertical stimuli].
    Wang X; Jiang F; Ma J; Hou X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 25(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 18435267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparisons of apparent mass responses of human subjects seated on rigid and elastic seats under vertical vibration.
    Dewangan KN; Rakheja S; Marcotte P; Shahmir A; Patra SK
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(12):1806-22. PubMed ID: 24088118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acute effects of mechanical shocks on finger blood flow: influence of shock repetition rate and shock magnitude.
    Ye Y; Mauro M; Bovenzi M; Griffin MJ
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2012 Aug; 85(6):605-14. PubMed ID: 21964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modelling the dynamic mechanisms associated with the principal resonance of the seated human body.
    Matsumoto Y; Griffin MJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001; 16 Suppl 1():S31-44. PubMed ID: 11275341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Experimental investigation of biodynamic human body models subjected to whole-body vibration during a vehicle ride.
    Taskin Y; Hacioglu Y; Ortes F; Karabulut D; Arslan YZ
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2019 Dec; 25(4):530-544. PubMed ID: 29252111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Finite element modelling and biodynamic response prediction of the seated human body exposed to whole-body vibration.
    Gao K; Zhang Z; Lu H; Xu Z; He Y
    Ergonomics; 2023 Dec; 66(12):1854-1867. PubMed ID: 36656143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Subjective discomfort caused by vertical whole-body vibration in the frequency range 2-100 Hz.
    Huang Y; Zhang P
    Ergonomics; 2019 Mar; 62(3):420-430. PubMed ID: 30296383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of gender on the biodynamic responses to vibration induced by a whole-body vibration training machine.
    Nawayseh N; Sinan HA; Alteneiji S; Hamdan S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Mar; 233(3):383-392. PubMed ID: 30887901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of the apparent mass of the seated human measured using random and sinusoidal vibration.
    Mansfield NJ; Maeda S
    Ind Health; 2005 Jan; 43(1):233-40. PubMed ID: 15732328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the apparent mass during exposure to whole-body vertical vibration between Japanese subjects and ISO 5982 standard.
    Maeda S; Mansfield NJ
    Ind Health; 2005 Jul; 43(3):436-40. PubMed ID: 16100920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of vibration magnitude, vibration spectrum and muscle tension on apparent mass and cross axis transfer functions during whole-body vibration exposure.
    Mansfield NJ; Holmlund P; Lundström R; Lenzuni P; Nataletti P
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(16):3062-70. PubMed ID: 16375910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of whole-body vibration on human biodynamic response.
    Smith SD
    J Gravit Physiol; 1995; 2(1):P96-9. PubMed ID: 11538949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Equal sensation curves for whole-body vibration expressed as a function of driving force.
    Mansfield NJ; Maeda S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jun; 117(6):3853-9. PubMed ID: 16018487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.