These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27207007)

  • 1. Marginal Accuracy of Castings Fabricated with Ringless Casting Investment System and Metal Ring Casting Investment System: A Comparative Study.
    Kalavathi M; Sachin B; Prasanna BG; Shreeharsha TV; Praveen B; Ragher M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Feb; 17(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 27207007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy of castings produced with ringless and metal ring investment systems.
    Lombardas P; Carbunaru A; McAlarney ME; Toothaker RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 10898838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Analysis of Marginal Accuracy of Complete Crowns Fabricated by Using Ringless and Metal Ring Investment Systems: An
    Saini N; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Tyagi R; Malethia A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):852-856. PubMed ID: 33568604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of ringless casting and accelerated wax-elimination technique: a comparative in vitro study.
    Prasad R; Al-Keraif AA; Kathuria N; Gandhi PV; Bhide SV
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 23889829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal accuracy of nickel chromium copings fabricated by conventional and accelerated casting procedures, produced with ringless and metal ring investment procedures: A comparative in vitro study.
    Alex D; Shetty YB; Miranda GA; Prabhu MB; Karkera R
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2015; 15(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 26929488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal Accuracy of Castings Produced with Different Investment Systems.
    Yadav RK
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2009 Apr; 65(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 27408222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of marginal accuracy of castings fabricated by conventional casting technique and accelerated casting technique: an in vitro study.
    Reddy SS; Revathi K; Reddy SK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(4):446-50. PubMed ID: 24047836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvement to the marginal coping fit of commercially pure titanium cast in phosphate-bonded investment by using a simple pattern coating technique.
    Pieralini AR; Nogueira F; Ribeiro RF; Adabo GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 22765986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Full-arch implant framework casting accuracy: preliminary in vitro observation for in vivo testing.
    Carr AB; Stewart RB
    J Prosthodont; 1993 Mar; 2(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 8374707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal gap of crowns made with a phosphate-bonded investment and accelerated casting method.
    Schilling ER; Miller BH; Woody RD; Miller AW; Nunn ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Feb; 81(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 9922424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dimensional Accuracy of Castings Fabricated with Ring-less and Metal Ring Investment Systems for Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis: An In-vitro Comparative Study.
    Shah R; Singh JP; Kumar M; D'Souza D
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2011 Jan; 67(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 27365761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Casting Ring Liner Length and Prewetting on the Marginal Adaptation and Dimensional Accuracy of Full Crown Castings.
    Haralur SB; Hamdi OA; Al-Shahrani AA; Alhasaniah S
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2017; 7(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 28316950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Accuracy of Metal Copings Fabricated using Direct Metal Laser Sintering, Computer-Aided Milling, Ringless Casting, and Traditional Casting Techniques: An
    James AE; Umamaheswari B; Shanthana Lakshmi CB
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 30166838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of a two-step ringless investment technique on alloy castability.
    Dern WM; Hinman RW; Hesby RA; Pelleu GB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jun; 53(6):874-6. PubMed ID: 3891986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal fit and surface roughness of crowns made with an accelerated casting technique.
    Konstantoulakis E; Nakajima H; Woody RD; Miller AW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Sep; 80(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 9760367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New die design for dimensional accuracy assessment of crown castings.
    Low D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 12675449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated on three different marginal designs using conventional and accelerated casting techniques: an in vitro study.
    Vaidya S; Parkash H; Bhargava A; Gupta S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):641-7. PubMed ID: 25511066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of an accelerated technique for casting post-and-core restorations with conventional techniques.
    Campagni WV; Reisbick MH; Jugan M
    J Prosthodont; 1993 Sep; 2(3):159-66. PubMed ID: 8298719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A modified phosphate-bonded casting investment.
    Finger W; Kota K
    Scand J Dent Res; 1982 Jun; 90(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 7051262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of sprue design on the marginal accuracy of titanium castings.
    Chan DC; Blackman R; Kaiser DA; Chung K
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Jun; 25(6):424-9. PubMed ID: 9687114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.