These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27207072)
1. Kinematic radiography of the hip joint after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Kawashima H; Kajino Y; Kabata T; Tsuchiya H; Sanada S; Ichikawa K Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jul; 9(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 27207072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Posterior femoroacetabular impingement (PFAI) - after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Ball ST; Schmalzried TP Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 19583549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impingement between the acetabular cup and the femoral neck after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Yoo MC; Cho YJ; Chun YS; Rhyu KH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():99-106. PubMed ID: 21543698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence and clinical relevance of radiographic signs of impingement in metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing. Gruen TA; Le Duff MJ; Wisk LE; Amstutz HC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Aug; 93(16):1519-26. PubMed ID: 22204007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement. Williams D; Royle M; Norton M J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jan; 24(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 18823742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal acetabular component orientation estimated using edge-loading and impingement risk in patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Mellon SJ; Grammatopoulos G; Andersen MS; Pandit HG; Gill HS; Murray DW J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 25482661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic Hip Kinematics During the Golf Swing After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Hara D; Nakashima Y; Hamai S; Higaki H; Ikebe S; Shimoto T; Yoshimoto K; Iwamoto Y Am J Sports Med; 2016 Jul; 44(7):1801-9. PubMed ID: 27037283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hip resurfacing requires larger acetabular cups than conventional hip replacement: a comparative analysis of 100 hips, based on radiographic templating. Schmidutz F; Fottner A; Wanke-Jellinek L; Steinbrück A; Jansson V; Mazzochian F Acta Orthop Belg; 2012 Aug; 78(4):484-91. PubMed ID: 23019781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resurfacing arthroplasty for hip dysplasia: a prospective randomised study. Wang Q; Zhang XL; Chen YS; Shen H; Shao JJ J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):768-73. PubMed ID: 22628590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics. Bourget-Murray J; Taneja A; Naserkhaki S; El-Rich M; Adeeb S; Powell J; Johnston K PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0252435. PubMed ID: 34043721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo kinematic analysis of squatting after total hip arthroplasty. Koyanagi J; Sakai T; Yamazaki T; Watanabe T; Akiyama K; Sugano N; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Jun; 26(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 21131111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease Influence Femoroacetabular Flexion in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty? Esposito CI; Miller TT; Kim HJ; Barlow BT; Wright TM; Padgett DE; Jerabek SA; Mayman DJ Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 474(8):1788-97. PubMed ID: 27020429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up. Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation. Seki M; Yuasa N; Ohkuni K J Orthop Res; 1998 Jul; 16(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 9747795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Motion Analysis of Lumbar Spine and Hip Joint on Sequential Radiographs Acquired with a Dynamic Flat-panel Detector (FPD) System]. Shimada K; Kawashima H; Yoshioka K; Sanada S Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Dec; 71(12):1174-9. PubMed ID: 26685828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo kinematic analysis of replaced hip during stationary cycling and computer simulation of optimal cup positioning against prosthetic impingement. Komiyama K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Yoshimoto K; Higaki H; Shiomoto K; Gondo H; Hara D; Wang Y; Nakashima Y Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Aug; 68():175-181. PubMed ID: 31229697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion. Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative and postoperative lower-extremity joint and pelvic kinematics during maximal squatting of patients with cam femoro-acetabular impingement. Lamontagne M; Brisson N; Kennedy MJ; Beaulé PE J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():40-5. PubMed ID: 21543687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hip flexion after Birmingham hip resurfacing: role of cup anteversion, anterior femoral head-neck offset, and head-neck ratio. Malviya A; Lingard EA; Malik A; Bowman R; Holland JP J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):387-91. PubMed ID: 19285379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic hip kinematics during squatting before and after total hip arthroplasty. Komiyama K; Hamai S; Hara D; Ikebe S; Higaki H; Yoshimoto K; Shiomoto K; Gondo H; Wang Y; Nakashima Y J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 13(1):162. PubMed ID: 29970119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]