These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27207097)

  • 1. Parenchymal-Sparing Hepatectomy Does Not Increase Intrahepatic Recurrence in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Liver Metastases.
    Matsumura M; Mise Y; Saiura A; Inoue Y; Ishizawa T; Ichida H; Matsuki R; Tanaka M; Takeda Y; Takahashi Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(11):3718-3726. PubMed ID: 27207097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic Parenchymal-Sparing Hepatectomy for Multiple Colorectal Liver Metastases Improves Outcomes and Salvageability: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Okumura S; Tabchouri N; Leung U; Tinguely P; Louvet C; Beaussier M; Gayet B; Fuks D
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 26(13):4576-4586. PubMed ID: 31605335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parenchymal-Sparing Versus Anatomic Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Systematic Review.
    Moris D; Ronnekleiv-Kelly S; Rahnemai-Azar AA; Felekouras E; Dillhoff M; Schmidt C; Pawlik TM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Jun; 21(6):1076-1085. PubMed ID: 28364212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parenchymal-sparing Hepatectomy in Colorectal Liver Metastasis Improves Salvageability and Survival.
    Mise Y; Aloia TA; Brudvik KW; Schwarz L; Vauthey JN; Conrad C
    Ann Surg; 2016 Jan; 263(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 25775068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parenchymal-Sparing Surgery for the Surgical Treatment of Multiple Colorectal Liver Metastases Is a Safer Approach than Major Hepatectomy Not Impairing Patients' Prognosis: A Bi-Institutional Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Donadon M; Cescon M; Cucchetti A; Cimino M; Costa G; Pesi B; Ercolani G; Pinna AD; Torzilli G
    Dig Surg; 2018; 35(4):342-349. PubMed ID: 29032372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Case-controlled study comparing peri-operative and cancer-related outcomes after major hepatectomy and parenchymal sparing hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Lordan JT; Roberts JK; Hodson J; Isaac J; Muiesan P; Mirza DF; Marudanayagam R; Sutcliffe RP
    HPB (Oxford); 2017 Aug; 19(8):688-694. PubMed ID: 28495437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy for deep-placed colorectal liver metastases.
    Matsuki R; Mise Y; Saiura A; Inoue Y; Ishizawa T; Takahashi Y
    Surgery; 2016 Nov; 160(5):1256-1263. PubMed ID: 27521044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases reduces postoperative morbidity while maintaining equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to non-parenchymal-sparing resection.
    Andreou A; Gloor S; Inglin J; Di Pietro Martinelli C; Banz V; Lachenmayer A; Kim-Fuchs C; Candinas D; Beldi G
    Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101631. PubMed ID: 34298267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of surgical margins on overall and recurrence-free survival in parenchymal-sparing laparoscopic liver resections of colorectal metastases.
    Montalti R; Tomassini F; Laurent S; Smeets P; De Man M; Geboes K; Libbrecht LJ; Troisi RI
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2736-47. PubMed ID: 25427420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomies (PSH) for bilobar colorectal liver metastases are associated with a lower morbidity and similar oncological results: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Memeo R; de Blasi V; Adam R; Goéré D; Azoulay D; Ayav A; Gregoire E; Kianmanesh R; Navarro F; Sa Cunha A; Pessaux P;
    HPB (Oxford); 2016 Sep; 18(9):781-90. PubMed ID: 27593596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parenchymal-sparing versus extended hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Deng G; Li H; Jia GQ; Fang D; Tang YY; Xie J; Chen KF; Chen ZY
    Cancer Med; 2019 Oct; 8(14):6165-6175. PubMed ID: 31464101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is Tumor Detachment from Vascular Structures Equivalent to R0 Resection in Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases? An Observational Cohort.
    Viganò L; Procopio F; Cimino MM; Donadon M; Gatti A; Costa G; Del Fabbro D; Torzilli G
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):1352-60. PubMed ID: 26714946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recurrence at surgical margin following hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases is not associated with R1 resection and does not impact survival.
    Andreou A; Knitter S; Schmelzle M; Kradolfer D; Maurer MH; Auer TA; Fehrenbach U; Lachenmayer A; Banz V; Schöning W; Candinas D; Pratschke J; Beldi G
    Surgery; 2021 May; 169(5):1061-1068. PubMed ID: 33386128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recurrence After Partial Hepatectomy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Potentially Curative Role of Salvage Repeat Resection.
    Butte JM; Gönen M; Allen PJ; Peter Kingham T; Sofocleous CT; DeMatteo RP; Fong Y; Kemeny NE; Jarnagin WR; D'Angelica MI
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 22(8):2761-71. PubMed ID: 25572686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parenchymal-sparing Hepatectomy as the New Doctrine in the Treatment of Liver-metastatic Colorectal Disease: Beyond Oncological Outcomes.
    Moris D; Dimitroulis D; Vernadakis S; Papalampros A; Spartalis E; Petrou A; Pawlik TM; Felekouras E
    Anticancer Res; 2017 Jan; 37(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 28011468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of parenchymal preserving surgery on survival and recurrence after liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis.
    Pandanaboyana S; Bell R; White A; Pathak S; Hidalgo E; Lodge P; Prasad R; Toogood G
    ANZ J Surg; 2018 Jan; 88(1-2):66-70. PubMed ID: 27111217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Colorectal liver metastases: hepatic pedicle clamping during hepatectomy reduces the incidence of tumor recurrence in selected patients. Case-matched analysis.
    De Carlis L; Di Sandro S; Giacomoni A; Mihaylov P; Lauterio A; Mangoni I; Cusumano C; Poli C; Tripepi M; Bencardino K
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jul; 39(7):726-33. PubMed ID: 23601983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of surgical margin on type of recurrence after liver resection for colorectal metastases: a single-center experience.
    Nuzzo G; Giuliante F; Ardito F; Vellone M; Giovannini I; Federico B; Vecchio FM
    Surgery; 2008 Mar; 143(3):384-93. PubMed ID: 18291260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy improves salvageability and survival for solitary small intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
    Li H; Li J; Ren B; Wang J; Xu L; Wang G; Wu H
    HPB (Oxford); 2021 Jun; 23(6):882-888. PubMed ID: 33187828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. RAS Mutation Predicts Positive Resection Margins and Narrower Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases.
    Brudvik KW; Mise Y; Chung MH; Chun YS; Kopetz SE; Passot G; Conrad C; Maru DM; Aloia TA; Vauthey JN
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):2635-43. PubMed ID: 27016292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.