These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27207202)

  • 1. Comparative Sensitivity Assessment of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Radiography for detecting Foreign Bodies.
    Lari SS; Shokri A; Hosseinipanah SM; Rostami S; Sabounchi SS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Mar; 17(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 27207202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Ultrasonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Detection of Foreign Bodies in Maxillofacial Region.
    Shokri A; Jamalpour M; Jafariyeh B; Poorolajal J; Sabet NK
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Apr; 11(4):TC15-TC19. PubMed ID: 28571230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of foreign bodies by spiral computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in maxillofacial regions.
    Kaviani F; Javad Rashid R; Shahmoradi Z; Gholamian M
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2014; 8(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 25346836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visibility of Different Intraorbital Foreign Bodies Using Plain Radiography, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study.
    Javadrashid R; Golamian M; Shahrzad M; Hajalioghli P; Shahmorady Z; Fouladi DF; Sadrarhami S; Akhoundzadeh L
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2017 May; 68(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 26899378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic yield of cone beam computed tomography for small foreign body detection in the hand in comparison with radiography, MSCT and MRI: an ex vivo study.
    Jandl NM; Rolvien T; Rupp T; Schumacher U; Püschel K; Maas KJ; Amling M; Henes FO; Spink C
    Injury; 2021 Oct; 52(10):2841-2847. PubMed ID: 33487409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of different foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region with spiral computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography: An in vitro study.
    Abolvardi M; Akhlaghian M; Hamidi Shishvan H; Dastan F
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2020 Dec; 50(4):291-298. PubMed ID: 33409137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of accuracy between panoramic radiography, cone-beam computed tomography, and ultrasonography in detection of foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region: an
    Abdinian M; Aminian M; Seyyedkhamesi S
    J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 44(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 29535965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography.
    Aras MH; Miloglu O; Barutcugil C; Kantarci M; Ozcan E; Harorli A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):72-8. PubMed ID: 20100917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visibility of different foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region using plain radiography, CT, MRI and ultrasonography: an in vitro study.
    Javadrashid R; Fouladi DF; Golamian M; Hajalioghli P; Daghighi MH; Shahmorady Z; Niknejad MT
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140229. PubMed ID: 25426703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in detecting apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a reference standard.
    Kanagasingam S; Lim CX; Yong CP; Mannocci F; Patel S
    Int Endod J; 2017 May; 50(5):417-426. PubMed ID: 27063209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Foreign bodies in the interior of the maxillary sinus: diagnosis by cone beam computed tomography.
    da Costa ED; Peyneau PD; Verner FS; Almeida SM; Ambrosano GMB
    Gen Dent; 2018; 66(3):38-40. PubMed ID: 29714698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption.
    Durack C; Patel S; Davies J; Wilson R; Mannocci F
    Int Endod J; 2011 Feb; 44(2):136-47. PubMed ID: 21083575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of Fractured Endodontic Instruments in Root Canals: Comparison between Different Digital Radiography Systems and Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
    Ramos Brito AC; Verner FS; Junqueira RB; Yamasaki MC; Queiroz PM; Freitas DQ; Oliveira-Santos C
    J Endod; 2017 Apr; 43(4):544-549. PubMed ID: 28216273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of various orthodontic materials as foreign bodies via panoramic radiography, cone beam computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography: an in vitro study.
    Isman O; Isman E
    Oral Radiol; 2021 Jul; 37(3):524-530. PubMed ID: 34037939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Visibility of Foreign Bodies in the Maxillofacial Region: Comparison of Computed Tomography, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Valizadeh S; Pouraliakbar H; Kiani L; Safi Y; Alibakhshi L
    Iran J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(4):e37265. PubMed ID: 27895878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and ultrasonography with two types of probes in the detection of opaque and non-opaque foreign bodies.
    Demiralp KO; Orhan K; Kurşun-Çakmak EŞ; Gorurgoz C; Bayrak S
    Med Ultrason; 2018 Dec; 20(4):467-474. PubMed ID: 30534654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiology of foreign bodies: how do we image them?
    Ingraham CR; Mannelli L; Robinson JD; Linnau KF
    Emerg Radiol; 2015 Aug; 22(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 25648360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of Cone-beam Computed Tomography with Periapical Radiography in the Detection of Separated Instruments Retained in the Apical Third of Root Canal-filled Teeth.
    Rosen E; Venezia NB; Azizi H; Kamburoglu K; Meirowitz A; Ziv-Baran T; Tsesis I
    J Endod; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1035-9. PubMed ID: 27238414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visibility of foreign bodies in soft tissue in plain radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. An in vitro study.
    Oikarinen KS; Nieminen TM; Mäkäräinen H; Pyhtinen J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1993 Apr; 22(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 8320449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How reliable and safe is full-body low-dose radiography (LODOX Statscan) in detecting foreign bodies ingested by adults?
    Mantokoudis G; Hegner S; Dubach P; Bonel HM; Senn P; Caversaccio MD; Exadaktylos AK
    Emerg Med J; 2013 Jul; 30(7):559-64. PubMed ID: 22833594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.