These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27208695)

  • 21. Assisted Reproductive Technology and Birth Defects Among Liveborn Infants in Florida, Massachusetts, and Michigan, 2000-2010.
    Boulet SL; Kirby RS; Reefhuis J; Zhang Y; Sunderam S; Cohen B; Bernson D; Copeland G; Bailey MA; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM;
    JAMA Pediatr; 2016 Jun; 170(6):e154934. PubMed ID: 27043648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Birth Outcomes by Infertility Treatment: Analyses of the Population-Based Cohort: Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).
    Luke B; Stern JE; Kotelchuck M; Declercq ER; Anderka M; Diop H
    J Reprod Med; 2016; 61(3-4):114-27. PubMed ID: 27172633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assisted Reproductive Technology and Birth Defects: Effects of Subfertility and Multiple Births.
    Liberman RF; Getz KD; Heinke D; Luke B; Stern JE; Declercq ER; Chen X; Lin AE; Anderka M
    Birth Defects Res; 2017 Aug; 109(14):1144-1153. PubMed ID: 28635008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Infertility treatment and children's longitudinal growth between birth and 3 years of age.
    Yeung EH; Sundaram R; Bell EM; Druschel C; Kus C; Xie Y; Buck Louis GM
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1621-8. PubMed ID: 27165624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of maternal height and weight on risk of preterm birth in singleton and twin births resulting from in vitro fertilization: a retrospective cohort study using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System.
    Dickey RP; Xiong X; Gee RE; Pridjian G
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Feb; 97(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 22154767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Birth outcomes of intended pregnancies among women who used assisted reproductive technology, ovulation stimulation, or no treatment.
    D'Angelo DV; Whitehead N; Helms K; Barfield W; Ahluwalia IB
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):314-320.e2. PubMed ID: 21718990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A population-based study of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology in Massachusetts.
    Schieve LA; Cohen B; Nannini A; Ferre C; Reynolds MA; Zhang Z; Jeng G; Macaluso M; Wright VC;
    Matern Child Health J; 2007 Nov; 11(6):517-25. PubMed ID: 17345154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of live-birth defects after luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles.
    Chen H; Wang Y; Lyu Q; Ai A; Fu Y; Tian H; Cai R; Hong Q; Chen Q; Shoham Z; Kuang Y
    Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):1194-1201.e2. PubMed ID: 25813280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of using donor sperm in assisted reproductive technology cycles on perinatal outcomes.
    Yu B; Fritz R; Xie X; Negassa A; Jindal S; Vega M; Buyuk E
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Dec; 110(7):1285-1289. PubMed ID: 30503127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices, and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey and Connecticut.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Jamieson DJ; Stone C; Mullen J; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 26515377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of father's age in fertile, subfertile, and assisted reproductive technology pregnancies: a population based cohort study.
    Stern JE; Luke B; Hornstein MD; Cabral H; Gopal D; Diop H; Kotelchuck M
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2014 Nov; 31(11):1437-44. PubMed ID: 25193289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Birth outcomes of singleton vaginal deliveries to ART-treated, subfertile, and fertile primiparous women.
    Stern JE; Liu CL; Cabral HJ; Richards EG; Coddington CC; Hwang S; Dukhovny D; Diop H; Missmer SA
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Sep; 35(9):1585-1593. PubMed ID: 29926374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2002.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2005 Jun; 54(2):1-24. PubMed ID: 15931153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prognostic indicators of assisted reproduction technology outcomes of cycles with ultralow serum antimüllerian hormone: a multivariate analysis of over 5,000 autologous cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012-2013.
    Seifer DB; Tal O; Wantman E; Edul P; Baker VL
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):385-93.e3. PubMed ID: 26515380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pregnancy outcomes decline with increasing recipient body mass index: an analysis of 22,317 fresh donor/recipient cycles from the 2008-2010 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System registry.
    Provost MP; Acharya KS; Acharya CR; Yeh JS; Steward RG; Eaton JL; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):364-8. PubMed ID: 26523329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Association of birth defects with the mode of assisted reproductive technology in a Chinese data-linkage cohort.
    Yu HT; Yang Q; Sun XX; Chen GW; Qian NS; Cai RZ; Guo HB; Wang CF
    Fertil Steril; 2018 May; 109(5):849-856. PubMed ID: 29778384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 30 years of data: impact of the United States in vitro fertilization data registry on advancing fertility care.
    Jain T; Grainger DA; Ball GD; Gibbons WE; Rebar RW; Robins JC; Leach RE
    Fertil Steril; 2019 Mar; 111(3):477-488. PubMed ID: 30737003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of assisted reproductive technology information on the Massachusetts birth certificate, 1997-2000.
    Zhang Z; Macaluso M; Cohen B; Schieve L; Nannini A; Chen M; Wright V;
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1657-61. PubMed ID: 20004392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer.
    Luke B; Brown MB; Missmer SA; Spector LG; Leach RE; Williams M; Koch L; Smith YR; Stern JE; Ball GD; Schymura MJ
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):183-9. PubMed ID: 26577302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
    Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.