These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27208695)

  • 41. Accuracy of assisted reproductive technology information on the Massachusetts birth certificate, 1997-2000.
    Zhang Z; Macaluso M; Cohen B; Schieve L; Nannini A; Chen M; Wright V;
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1657-61. PubMed ID: 20004392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer.
    Luke B; Brown MB; Missmer SA; Spector LG; Leach RE; Williams M; Koch L; Smith YR; Stern JE; Ball GD; Schymura MJ
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):183-9. PubMed ID: 26577302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
    Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System morphological measures to predict live birth after assisted reproductive technology.
    Luke B; Brown MB; Stern JE; Jindal SK; Racowsky C; Ball GD
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1338-44. PubMed ID: 25217871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update.
    Toner JP; Coddington CC; Doody K; Van Voorhis B; Seifer DB; Ball GD; Luke B; Wantman E
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):541-6. PubMed ID: 27301796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of race and ethnicity on utilization and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology in the USA.
    Shapiro AJ; Darmon SK; Barad DH; Albertini DF; Gleicher N; Kushnir VA
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 Jun; 15(1):44. PubMed ID: 28595591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Utility of the national embryo morphology data collection by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (SART): correlation between day-3 morphology grade and live-birth outcome.
    Vernon M; Stern JE; Ball GD; Wininger D; Mayer J; Racowsky C
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(8):2761-3. PubMed ID: 21406305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A prediction model for live birth and multiple births within the first three cycles of assisted reproductive technology.
    Luke B; Brown MB; Wantman E; Stern JE; Baker VL; Widra E; Coddington CC; Gibbons WE; Ball GD
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep; 102(3):744-52. PubMed ID: 24934487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2003.
    Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2006 May; 55(4):1-22. PubMed ID: 16723970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. How compliant are in vitro fertilization member clinics in following embryo transfer guidelines? An analysis of 59,689 fresh first in vitro fertilization autologous cycles from 2011 to 2012.
    Keyhan S; Acharya KS; Acharya CR; Yeh JS; Provost MP; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):645-652.e1. PubMed ID: 27268276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Diminished ovarian reserve in the United States assisted reproductive technology population: diagnostic trends among 181,536 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System.
    Devine K; Mumford SL; Wu M; DeCherney AH; Hill MJ; Propst A
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Sep; 104(3):612-19.e3. PubMed ID: 26049057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States.
    Reefhuis J; Honein MA; Schieve LA; Correa A; Hobbs CA; Rasmussen SA;
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Feb; 24(2):360-6. PubMed ID: 19010807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Surveillance of congenital malformations in infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology or other fertility treatments.
    Heisey AS; Bell EM; Herdt-Losavio ML; Druschel C
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2015 Feb; 103(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 25684703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Linking birth and infant death records with assisted reproductive technology data: Massachusetts, 1997-1998.
    Sunderam S; Schieve LA; Cohen B; Zhang Z; Jeng G; Reynolds M; Wright V; Johnson C; Macaluso M;
    Matern Child Health J; 2006 Mar; 10(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 16328709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preterm birth among primiparas.
    Dunietz GL; Holzman C; McKane P; Li C; Boulet SL; Todem D; Kissin DM; Copeland G; Bernson D; Sappenfield WM; Diamond MP
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):974-979.e1. PubMed ID: 25707336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
    Qin J; Liu X; Sheng X; Wang H; Gao S
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jan; 105(1):73-85.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26453266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
    Okun N; Sierra S; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The impact of single-step and sequential embryo culture systems on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.
    Sacha CR; Gopal D; Liu CL; Cabral HR; Stern JE; Carusi DA; Racowsky C; Bormann CL
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Jun; 117(6):1246-1254. PubMed ID: 35473909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Impact of single embryo transfer policy on perinatal outcomes in fresh and frozen cycles-analysis of the Japanese Assisted Reproduction Technology registry between 2007 and 2012.
    Takeshima K; Jwa SC; Saito H; Nakaza A; Kuwahara A; Ishihara O; Irahara M; Hirahara F; Yoshimura Y; Sakumoto T
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):337-46.e3. PubMed ID: 26518122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2006.
    Sunderam S; Chang J; Flowers L; Kulkarni A; Sentelle G; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2009 Jun; 58(5):1-25. PubMed ID: 19521336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.