These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27208791)

  • 1. Perceptually aligning apical frequency regions leads to more binaural fusion of speech in a cochlear implant simulation.
    Staisloff HE; Lee DH; Aronoff JM
    Hear Res; 2016 Jul; 337():59-64. PubMed ID: 27208791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness.
    Ma N; Morris S; Kitterick PT
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):248-59. PubMed ID: 27116049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking With Single-Sided Vocoders.
    Wess JM; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28002083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unilateral spectral and temporal compression reduces binaural fusion for normal hearing listeners with cochlear implant simulations.
    Aronoff JM; Shayman C; Prasad A; Suneel D; Stelmach J
    Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 320():24-9. PubMed ID: 25549574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binaural fusion and listening effort in children who use bilateral cochlear implants: a psychoacoustic and pupillometric study.
    Steel MM; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117611. PubMed ID: 25668423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
    Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binaural Pitch Fusion in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Reiss LAJ; Fowler JR; Hartling CL; Oh Y
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):390-397. PubMed ID: 28945657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Xu K; Willis S; Gopen Q; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb C; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2272-87. PubMed ID: 23556595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved interaural timing of acoustic nerve stimulation affects sound localization in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
    Seebacher J; Franke-Trieger A; Weichbold V; Zorowka P; Stephan K
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():19-27. PubMed ID: 30439571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interactions between unsupervised learning and the degree of spectral mismatch on short-term perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted speech.
    Li T; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):238-49. PubMed ID: 19194293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential Effects of Binaural Pitch Fusion Range on the Benefits of Voice Gender Differences in a "Cocktail Party" Environment for Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Oh Y; Srinivasan NK; Hartling CL; Gallun FJ; Reiss LAJ
    Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):318-329. PubMed ID: 36395512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaural Place-of-Stimulation Mismatch Estimates Using CT Scans and Binaural Perception, But Not Pitch, Are Consistent in Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Bernstein JGW; Jensen KK; Stakhovskaya OA; Noble JH; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Shih R; Kolberg E; Cleary M; Goupell MJ
    J Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 41(49):10161-10178. PubMed ID: 34725189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interleaved Processors Improve Cochlear Implant Patients' Spectral Resolution.
    Aronoff JM; Stelmach J; Padilla M; Landsberger DM
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e85-90. PubMed ID: 26656190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Two Place-Based Mapping Procedures on Masked Sentence Recognition as a Function of Electrode Array Angular Insertion Depth and Presence of Acoustic Low-Frequency Information: A Simulation Study.
    Dillon MT; Buss E; Johnson AD; Canfarotta MW; O'Connell BP
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(6):478-487. PubMed ID: 37482054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.