These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27208919)

  • 1. Modeling spatiotemporal bacterial variability with meteorological and watershed land-use characteristics.
    Cha Y; Park MH; Lee SH; Kim JH; Cho KH
    Water Res; 2016 Sep; 100():306-315. PubMed ID: 27208919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of seasonal and inter-annual hydro-meteorological variability on surface water fecal coliform concentration under varying land-use composition.
    St Laurent J; Mazumder A
    Water Res; 2014 Jan; 48():170-8. PubMed ID: 24095594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatiotemporal variability and key influencing factors of river fecal coliform within a typical complex watershed.
    Zhang X; Zhi X; Chen L; Shen Z
    Water Res; 2020 Jul; 178():115835. PubMed ID: 32330732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The modified SWAT model for predicting fecal coliforms in the Wachusett Reservoir Watershed, USA.
    Cho KH; Pachepsky YA; Kim JH; Kim JW; Park MH
    Water Res; 2012 Oct; 46(15):4750-60. PubMed ID: 22784807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Climate relationships to fecal bacterial densities in Maryland shellfish harvest waters.
    Leight AK; Hood R; Wood R; Brohawn K
    Water Res; 2016 Feb; 89():270-81. PubMed ID: 26689664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of rainfall on fecal coliform bacteria in Bayou Dorcheat (North Louisiana).
    Hill DD; Owens WE; Tchounwou PB
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2006 Mar; 3(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 16823083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing fecal coliform fate and transport in a coastal watershed using HSPF.
    Rolle K; Gitau MW; Chen G; Chauhan A
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 22797240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning hierarchical Bayesian networks to assess the interaction effects of controlling factors on spatiotemporal patterns of fecal pollution in streams.
    Kim T; Lee D; Shin J; Kim Y; Cha Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 812():152520. PubMed ID: 34953848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fecal coliform modeling under two flow scenarios in St. Louis Bay of Mississippi.
    Liu Z; Hashim NB; Kingery WL; Huddleston DH
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2010; 45(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 20390869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precipitation thresholds for fecal bacterial indicators in the Chesapeake Bay.
    Leight AK; Hood RR
    Water Res; 2018 Aug; 139():252-262. PubMed ID: 29655096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using Multiple Antibiotic Resistance and land use characteristics to determine sources of fecal coliform bacterial pollution.
    Kelsey RH; Scott GI; Porter DE; Thompson B; Webster L
    Environ Monit Assess; 2003; 81(1-3):337-48. PubMed ID: 12620026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The seasonality of fecal coliform bacteria pollution and its influence on closures of shellfish harvesting areas in Mississippi Sound.
    Chigbu P; Gordon S; Tchounwou PB
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2005 Aug; 2(2):362-73. PubMed ID: 16705840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fecal bacteria in the rivers of the Seine drainage network (France): sources, fate and modelling.
    Servais P; Garcia-Armisen T; George I; Billen G
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Apr; 375(1-3):152-67. PubMed ID: 17239424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial and temporal variability of fecal indicator bacteria in an urban stream under different meteorological regimes.
    Cha SM; Lee SW; Park YE; Cho KH; Lee S; Kim JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(12):3102-8. PubMed ID: 20555206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of the sources of fecal coliforms in an urban watershed using antibiotic resistance analysis.
    Whitlock JE; Jones DT; Harwood VJ
    Water Res; 2002 Oct; 36(17):4273-82. PubMed ID: 12420932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional modeling of fecal coliform in the Tidal Basin and Washington Channel, Washington, DC.
    Bai S; Lung WS
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2006; 41(7):1327-46. PubMed ID: 16854806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A geospatial analysis of land use and stormwater management on fecal coliform contamination in North Carolina streams.
    Vitro KA; BenDor TK; Jordanova TV; Miles B
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 603-604():709-727. PubMed ID: 28359567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of fecal coliform inputs to aquatic systems through soil leaching.
    George I; Anzil A; Servais P
    Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(3):611-8. PubMed ID: 14723930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating the fate and transport of fecal coliform contamination in a tidal estuarine system using a three-dimensional model.
    Chen WB; Liu WC
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2017 Mar; 116(1-2):365-384. PubMed ID: 28117132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A changing estuary: Understanding historical patterns in salinity and fecal coliform levels in the May River, SC.
    Soueidan J; Warren A; Pearson M; Montie EW
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2021 Jul; 168():112384. PubMed ID: 33901906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.