BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27209276)

  • 1. Extended amplification of acoustic signals by amphibian burrows.
    Muñoz MI; Penna M
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2016 Jul; 202(7):473-87. PubMed ID: 27209276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amplification and spectral shifts of vocalizations inside burrows of the frog Eupsophus calcaratus (Leptodactylidae).
    Penna M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1254-60. PubMed ID: 15376690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vocal responses of austral forest frogs to amplitude and degradation patterns of advertisement calls.
    Penna M; Moreno-Gómez FN; Muñoz MI; Cisternas J
    Behav Processes; 2017 Jul; 140():190-201. PubMed ID: 28512036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ample active acoustic space of a frog from the South American temperate forest.
    Penna M; Moreno-Gómez FN
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2014 Mar; 200(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 24356786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Severe constraints for sound communication in a frog from the South American temperate forest.
    Penna M; Plaza A; Moreno-Gómez FN
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2013 Aug; 199(8):723-33. PubMed ID: 23748250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biotic and abiotic sounds affect calling activity but not plasma testosterone levels in male frogs (Batrachyla taeniata) in the field and in captivity.
    Muñoz MI; Quispe M; Maliqueo M; Penna M
    Horm Behav; 2020 Feb; 118():104605. PubMed ID: 31644890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrasting Propagation of Natural Calls of Two Anuran Species from the South American Temperate Forest.
    Penna M; Moreno-Gómez FN
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134498. PubMed ID: 26230852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Torrent frogs emit acoustic signals of a narrower spectral range in habitats with longer-lasting biotic background noise.
    Forti LR; de Melo Sampaio MR; Pires CR; Szabo JK; Toledo LF
    Behav Processes; 2022 Aug; 200():104700. PubMed ID: 35798216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Call transmission efficiency in native and invasive anurans: competing hypotheses of divergence in acoustic signals.
    Llusia D; Gómez M; Penna M; Márquez R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77312. PubMed ID: 24155940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geographic variation in acoustic communication in anurans and its neuroethological implications.
    Velásquez NA
    J Physiol Paris; 2014; 108(2-3):167-73. PubMed ID: 25446892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Lombard effect in male ultrasonic frogs: Regulating antiphonal signal frequency and amplitude in noise.
    Shen JX; Xu ZM
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27103. PubMed ID: 27345957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing the evolution of acoustic communication: biological constraints.
    Ryan MJ
    Brain Behav Evol; 1986; 28(1-3):70-82. PubMed ID: 3567542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The biological significance of acoustic stimuli determines ear preference in the music frog.
    Xue F; Fang G; Yang P; Zhao E; Brauth SE; Tang Y
    J Exp Biol; 2015 Mar; 218(Pt 5):740-7. PubMed ID: 25740903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence of auditory insensitivity to vocalization frequencies in two frogs.
    Goutte S; Mason MJ; Christensen-Dalsgaard J; Montealegre-Z F; Chivers BD; Sarria-S FA; Antoniazzi MM; Jared C; Almeida Sato L; Felipe Toledo L
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):12121. PubMed ID: 28935936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neglecting the call of the wild: Captive frogs like the sound of their own voice.
    Passos LF; Garcia G; Young RJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181931. PubMed ID: 28732034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vocalizations in juvenile anurans: common spadefoot toads (Pelobates fuscus) regularly emit calls before sexual maturity.
    Ten Hagen L; Rodríguez A; Menke N; Göcking C; Bisping M; Frommolt KH; Ziegler T; Bonkowski M; Vences M
    Naturwissenschaften; 2016 Oct; 103(9-10):75. PubMed ID: 27590626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic interference and recognition space within a complex assemblage of dendrobatid frogs.
    Amézquita A; Flechas SV; Lima AP; Gasser H; Hödl W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Oct; 108(41):17058-63. PubMed ID: 21969562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real estate ads in Emei music frog vocalizations: female preference for calls emanating from burrows.
    Cui J; Tang Y; Narins PM
    Biol Lett; 2012 Jun; 8(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 22158736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Propagation of natural toad calls in a Mediterranean terrestrial environment.
    Penna M; Llusia D; Márquez R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):4025-31. PubMed ID: 23231131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Old world frog and bird vocalizations contain prominent ultrasonic harmonics.
    Narins PM; Feng AS; Lin W; Schnitzler HU; Denzinger A; Suthers RA; Xu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Feb; 115(2):910-3. PubMed ID: 15000202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.