These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27209418)
1. Dynamic MR in patients affected by neurogenical claudication: technique and results from a single-center experience. Muto M; Giurazza F; Guarnieri G; Senese R; Schena E; Zeccolini F; Diano A Neuroradiology; 2016 Aug; 58(8):765-70. PubMed ID: 27209418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of listhesis on upright radiographs and central lumbar spinal canal stenosis on supine MRI: is it possible to predict lumbar spinal canal stenosis? Finkenstaedt T; Del Grande F; Bolog N; Ulrich NH; Tok S; Burgstaller JM; Steurer J; Chung CB; Andreisek G; Winklhofer S; Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Sep; 47(9):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 29651713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Importance of Axial Loaded Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Suspected Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis. Sasani H; Solmaz B; Sasani M; Vural M; Ozer AF World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():e69-e75. PubMed ID: 30857995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in dural sac caliber with standing MRI improve correlation with symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis. Lau YYO; Lee RKL; Griffith JF; Chan CLY; Law SW; Kwok KO Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2666-2675. PubMed ID: 28702785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total sagittal spinal alignment in patients with lumbar canal stenosis accompanied by intermittent claudication. Suzuki H; Endo K; Kobayashi H; Tanaka H; Yamamoto K Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):E344-6. PubMed ID: 20375774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography? Kanno H; Endo T; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Itoi E; Ishii Y Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lumbar spine: quantitative and qualitative assessment of positional (upright flexion and extension) MR imaging and myelography. Wildermuth S; Zanetti M; Duewell S; Schmid MR; Romanowski B; Benini A; Böni T; Hodler J Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):391-8. PubMed ID: 9577486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The value of dynamic radiographic myelography in addition to magnetic resonance imaging in detection lumbar spinal canal stenosis: A prospective study. Merkle M; Maier G; Danz S; Kaminsky J; Tatagiba MS; Hebela NM; Roser F Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Apr; 143():4-8. PubMed ID: 26874937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal: axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication. Willén J; Danielson B; Gaulitz A; Niklason T; Schönström N; Hansson T Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Dec; 22(24):2968-76. PubMed ID: 9431634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of body position and axial load on spinal canal morphology: an MRI study of central spinal stenosis. Madsen R; Jensen TS; Pope M; Sørensen JS; Bendix T Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18165750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increased Facet Fluid Predicts Dynamic Changes in the Dural Sac Size on Axial-Loaded MRI in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis. Kanno H; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Aizawa T; Itoi E AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Apr; 37(4):730-5. PubMed ID: 26564439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation Between Dural Sac Size in Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Symptoms in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Zhou Z; Jin Z; Zhang P; Shan B; Zhou Z; Zhang Y; Deng Y; Zhou X World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e866-e873. PubMed ID: 31715409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine with dedicated G-scan machine in the upright position: a retrospective study and our experience in 10 years with 4305 patients. Splendiani A; Perri M; Grattacaso G; Di Tunno V; Marsecano C; Panebianco L; Gennarelli A; Felli V; Varrassi M; Barile A; Di Cesare E; Masciocchi C; Gallucci M Radiol Med; 2016 Jan; 121(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 26215713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Lumbar Lordosis in Lateral Radiographs in Standing Position with supine MR Imaging in consideration of the Sacral Slope. Benditz A; Boluki D; Weber M; Zeman F; Grifka J; Völlner F Rofo; 2017 Mar; 189(3):233-239. PubMed ID: 28002853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of cauda equina nerve root dispersion through radiomics features in weight-bearing MRI in normal subjects and spinal canal stenosis patients. Levi R; Battaglia M; Garoli F; Cappellini LA; De Robertis M; Anselmi L; Savini G; Riva M; Fornari M; Grimaldi M; Politi LS Eur Radiol; 2024 Jul; 34(7):4585-4595. PubMed ID: 38057593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of lumbar canal stenosis: decubitus imaging methods versus flexion-extension myelography and surface measurements versus the diameter of the dural sac]. Coulier B JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 10859898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Anatomical background of low back pain: variability and degeneration of the lumbar spinal canal and intervertebral disc]. van Roy P; Barbaix E; Clarijs JP; Mense S Schmerz; 2001 Dec; 15(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 11793145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of low back posture on the morphology of the spinal canal. Chung SS; Lee CS; Kim SH; Chung MW; Ahn JM Skeletal Radiol; 2000 Apr; 29(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 10855470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]