322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27209792)
1. Landscape patterns of bioenergy in a changing climate: implications for crop allocation and land-use competition.
Graves RA; Pearson SM; Turner MG
Ecol Appl; 2016 Mar; 26(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 27209792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of freeze-thaw cycles on greenhouse gas emissions in marginally productive agricultural land under different perennial bioenergy crops.
Osei AK; Rezanezhad F; Oelbermann M
J Environ Manage; 2024 Apr; 357():120739. PubMed ID: 38552522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The biogeochemistry of bioenergy landscapes: carbon, nitrogen, and water considerations.
Robertson GP; Hamilton SK; Del Grosso SJ; Parton WJ
Ecol Appl; 2011 Jun; 21(4):1055-67. PubMed ID: 21774413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bioenergy crop production and carbon sequestration potential under changing climate and land use: A case study in the upper River Taw catchment in southwest England.
Dixit PN; Richter GM; Coleman K; Collins AL
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Nov; 900():166390. PubMed ID: 37597557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interactions among bioenergy feedstock choices, landscape dynamics, and land use.
Dale VH; Kline KL; Wright LL; Perlack RD; Downing M; Graham RL
Ecol Appl; 2011 Jun; 21(4):1039-54. PubMed ID: 21774412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel framework to classify marginal land for sustainable biomass feedstock production.
Gopalakrishnan G; Cristina Negri M; Snyder SW
J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(5):1593-600. PubMed ID: 21869522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Climate mitigation and the future of tropical landscapes.
Thomson AM; Calvin KV; Chini LP; Hurtt G; Edmonds JA; Bond-Lamberty B; Frolking S; Wise MA; Janetos AC
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Nov; 107(46):19633-8. PubMed ID: 20921413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes.
Werling BP; Dickson TL; Isaacs R; Gaines H; Gratton C; Gross KL; Liere H; Malmstrom CM; Meehan TD; Ruan L; Robertson BA; Robertson GP; Schmidt TM; Schrotenboer AC; Teal TK; Wilson JK; Landis DA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jan; 111(4):1652-7. PubMed ID: 24474791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bird communities in future bioenergy landscapes of the Upper Midwest.
Meehan TD; Hurlbert AH; Gratton C
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18533-8. PubMed ID: 20921398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implications for the hydrologic cycle under climate change due to the expansion of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States.
Le PV; Kumar P; Drewry DT
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Sep; 108(37):15085-90. PubMed ID: 21876137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Global climate niche estimates for bioenergy crops and invasive species of agronomic origin: potential problems and opportunities.
Barney JN; DiTomaso JM
PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e17222. PubMed ID: 21408056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass.
Schmer MR; Vogel KP; Mitchell RB; Perrin RK
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jan; 105(2):464-9. PubMed ID: 18180449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems.
Adler PR; Del Grosso SJ; Parton WJ
Ecol Appl; 2007 Apr; 17(3):675-91. PubMed ID: 17494388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioenergy crops Miscanthus x giganteus and Panicum virgatum reduce growth and survivorship of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).
Nabity PD; Zangerl AR; Berenbaum MR; DeLucia EH
J Econ Entomol; 2011 Apr; 104(2):459-64. PubMed ID: 21510193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the availability of agricultural crop residues in the European Union: potential and limitations for bioenergy use.
Scarlat N; Martinov M; Dallemand JF
Waste Manag; 2010 Oct; 30(10):1889-97. PubMed ID: 20494567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands.
Campbell JE; Lobell DB; Genova RC; Field CB
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Aug; 42(15):5791-4. PubMed ID: 18754510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatiotemporal assessment of farm-gate production costs and economic potential of
Zhang B; Hastings A; Clifton-Brown JC; Jiang D; Faaij APC
Glob Change Biol Bioenergy; 2020 May; 12(5):310-327. PubMed ID: 32421018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trading carbon for food: global comparison of carbon stocks vs. crop yields on agricultural land.
West PC; Gibbs HK; Monfreda C; Wagner J; Barford CC; Carpenter SR; Foley JA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Nov; 107(46):19645-8. PubMed ID: 21041633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biofuels and biodiversity.
Wiens J; Fargione J; Hill J
Ecol Appl; 2011 Jun; 21(4):1085-95. PubMed ID: 21774415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modeling Miscanthus in the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) to simulate its water quality effects as a bioenergy crop.
Ng TL; Eheart JW; Cai X; Miguez F
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 44(18):7138-44. PubMed ID: 20681575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
