112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2721054)
1. The survival of the cemented femoral component of a total hip replacement.
Ritter MA; Campbell ED
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Jun; (243):143-7. PubMed ID: 2721054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult.
Callaghan JJ; Forest EE; Sporer SM; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):257-62. PubMed ID: 9372776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty using rough and smooth surface femoral stems with similar design: 10-year survivorship of 48 cases.
Datir SP; Wynn-Jones CH
Acta Orthop; 2005 Dec; 76(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 16470434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factors for recurrent aseptic loosening of the femoral component after cemented revision.
Retpen JB; Jensen JS
J Arthroplasty; 1993 Oct; 8(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 8245992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term survival of the T-28 versus the TR-28 cemented total hip arthroplasties.
Meding JB; Nassif JM; Ritter MA
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Oct; 15(7):928-33. PubMed ID: 11061455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
Behairy YM; Harris WH
Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Good long term results with a cemented straight femoral shaft prosthesis made of titanium].
Eingartner C; Ihm A; Maurer F; Volkmann R; Weise K; Weller S
Unfallchirurg; 2002 Sep; 105(9):804-10. PubMed ID: 12232740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
Engesaeter LB; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Furnes O; Havelin LI
Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 16819671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening.
Gustilo RB; Pasternak HS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):111-9. PubMed ID: 3416518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The case for cementing all femoral components in total hip replacement.
Harris WH
Can J Surg; 1995 Feb; 38 Suppl 1():S55-60. PubMed ID: 7874631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The rationale for cementless revision total hip replacement with contemporary technology.
Gorab RS; Covino BM; Borden LS
Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):627-33. PubMed ID: 8414428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties.
Havelin LI; Engesaeter LB; Espehaug B; Furnes O; Lie SA; Vollset SE
Acta Orthop Scand; 2000 Aug; 71(4):337-53. PubMed ID: 11028881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary cemented total hip arthroplasty: five to twelve year clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Hirose I; Capello WN; Feinberg JR; Shirer RM
Iowa Orthop J; 1995; 15():43-7. PubMed ID: 7634044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ten-year survivorship of rough-surfaced femoral stem with geometry similar to Charnley femoral stem.
Datir SP; Kurta IC; Wynn-Jones CH
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):392-7. PubMed ID: 16627148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors affecting aseptic loosening of 4750 total hip arthroplasties: multivariate survival analysis.
Bordini B; Stea S; De Clerico M; Strazzari S; Sasdelli A; Toni A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Jul; 8():69. PubMed ID: 17650301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
