BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27210567)

  • 1. The effect of dynamic hip motion on the micromotion of press-fit acetabular cups in six degrees of freedom.
    Crosnier EA; Keogh PS; Miles AW
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Aug; 38(8):717-24. PubMed ID: 27210567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel method to assess primary stability of press-fit acetabular cups.
    Crosnier EA; Keogh PS; Miles AW
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Nov; 228(11):1126-34. PubMed ID: 25384445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
    Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acetabular micromotion as a measure of initial implant stability in primary hip arthroplasty. An in vitro comparison of different methods of initial acetabular component fixation.
    Perona PG; Lawrence J; Paprosky WG; Patwardhan AG; Sartori M
    J Arthroplasty; 1992 Dec; 7(4):537-47. PubMed ID: 1479374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Contact surface and pressure load at implant-bone interface in press-fit cups compared to natural hip joints].
    Widmer KH; Zurfluh B; Morscher EW
    Orthopade; 1997 Feb; 26(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 9157358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does osteoporosis reduce the primary tilting stability of cementless acetabular cups?
    von Schulze Pellengahr C; von Engelhardt LV; Wegener B; Müller PE; Fottner A; Weber P; Ackermann O; Lahner M; Teske W
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():95. PubMed ID: 25896824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial stability of cementless acetabular cups: press-fit and screw fixation interaction--an in vitro biomechanical study.
    Tabata T; Kaku N; Hara K; Tsumura H
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Apr; 25(3):497-502. PubMed ID: 25421640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Load transfer and fixation mode of press-fit acetabular sockets.
    Widmer KH; Zurfluh B; Morscher EW
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Oct; 17(7):926-35. PubMed ID: 12375254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel micromotion measurement method to gain instructive insight into the acetabular bone-implant interface.
    Heilemann M; Wendler T; Münst P; Schleifenbaum S; Scholz R; Voigt C
    Med Eng Phys; 2020 Dec; 86():138-145. PubMed ID: 33261727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of under-reaming on the cup/bone interface of a press fit hip replacement.
    Zivkovic I; Gonzalez M; Amirouche F
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Apr; 132(4):041008. PubMed ID: 20387971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Micromotion of cementless hemispherical acetabular components. Does press-fit need adjunctive screw fixation?
    Won CH; Hearn TC; Tile M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 May; 77(3):484-9. PubMed ID: 7744942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro examination of the primary stability of three press-fit acetabular cups under consideration of two different bearing couples.
    Jahnke A; Bott CC; Fonseca Ulloa CA; Jahnke GW; Rickert M; Ishaque BA; Ahmed GA
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 May; 67():49-54. PubMed ID: 30902521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Allofit cementless acetabular component: five-year experience].
    Hoza P; Pilný J; Kubeš J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2013; 80(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 23562260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment of High-Grade Acetabular Defects: Do Porous Titanium Cups Provide Better Stability Than Traditional Titanium Cups When Combined With an Augment?
    Beckmann NA; Bitsch RG; Janoszka MB; Klotz MC; Bruckner T; Jaeger S
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1838-1843. PubMed ID: 29510951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Initial stability of press-fit acetabular components under rotational forces.
    Fehring KA; Owen JR; Kurdin AA; Wayne JS; Jiranek WA
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 May; 29(5):1038-42. PubMed ID: 24238907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simplified motion and loading compared to physiological motion and loading in a hip joint simulator.
    Smith SL; Unsworth A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2000; 214(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10902437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of cementless cup surface on stability and bone fixation 2 years after total hip arthroplasty.
    Urbański W; Krawczyk A; Dragan SŁ; Kulej M; Dragan SF
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2012; 14(2):27-35. PubMed ID: 22793261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of bearing friction torques on the primary stability of press-fit acetabular cups: A novel in vitro method.
    Jahnke A; Schroeder S; Fonseca Ulloa CA; Ahmed GA; Ishaque BA; Rickert M
    J Orthop Res; 2018 Oct; 36(10):2745-2753. PubMed ID: 29744927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Mid-term results of cementless ultima cups in primary total hip replacement].
    Hrubina M; Behounek J; Skoták M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Jun; 75(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 18601819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does a titanium-coated polyethylene press-fit cup give reliable midterm results?
    Hooper N; Sargeant H; Frampton C; Hooper G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3806-10. PubMed ID: 26373851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.