991 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27212057)
1. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consequences of Stimulus Type on Higher-Order Processing in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.
Finke M; Sandmann P; Bönitz H; Kral A; Büchner A
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(5):305-315. PubMed ID: 27866186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The timecourse of multisensory speech processing in unilaterally stimulated cochlear implant users revealed by ERPs.
Layer N; Weglage A; Müller V; Meister H; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Murray MM; Sandmann P
Neuroimage Clin; 2022; 34():102982. PubMed ID: 35303598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Age effects on cognitive functions and speech-in-noise processing: An event-related potential study with cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Burkhardt P; Müller V; Meister H; Weglage A; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1005859. PubMed ID: 36620447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cognitive factors contribute to speech perception in cochlear-implant users and age-matched normal-hearing listeners under vocoded conditions.
O'Neill ER; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):195. PubMed ID: 31370651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Event-related potentials for better speech perception in noise by cochlear implant users.
Soshi T; Hisanaga S; Kodama N; Kanekama Y; Samejima Y; Yumoto E; Sekiyama K
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():110-21. PubMed ID: 25158303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Event-Related Potentials of Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users: Using a Semantic Oddball Paradigm in Noise.
Voola M; Wedekind A; Nguyen AT; Marinovic W; Rajan G; Tavora-Vieira D
Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(4):280-293. PubMed ID: 36940674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lexical-Access Ability and Cognitive Predictors of Speech Recognition in Noise in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Kaandorp MW; Smits C; Merkus P; Festen JM; Goverts ST
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517743887. PubMed ID: 29205095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in Speech-Related Brain Activity During Adaptation to Electro-Acoustic Hearing.
Balkenhol T; Wallhäusser-Franke E; Rotter N; Servais JJ
Front Neurol; 2020; 11():161. PubMed ID: 32300327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of noise and noise reduction on audiovisual speech perception in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
Layer N; Abdel-Latif KHA; Radecke JO; Müller V; Weglage A; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
Clin Neurophysiol; 2023 Oct; 154():141-156. PubMed ID: 37611325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.
Xie Z; Stakhovskaya O; Goupell MJ; Anderson S
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):719-740. PubMed ID: 34231111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Beta-band activity in auditory pathways reflects speech localization and recognition in bilateral cochlear implant users.
Senkowski D; Pomper U; Fitzner I; Engel AK; Kral A
Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Jul; 35(7):3107-21. PubMed ID: 24123535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
