143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27213772)
1. Evaluation of Techniques for Measuring Microbial Hazards in Bathing Waters: A Comparative Study.
Schang C; Henry R; Kolotelo PA; Prosser T; Crosbie N; Grant T; Cottam D; O'Brien P; Coutts S; Deletic A; McCarthy DT
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155848. PubMed ID: 27213772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cross comparison of QPCR to agar-based or defined substrate test methods for the determination of Escherichia coli and enterococci in municipal water quality monitoring programs.
Lavender JS; Kinzelman JL
Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4967-79. PubMed ID: 19717179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are the defined substrate-based methods adequate to determine the microbiological quality of natural recreational waters?
Valente MS; Pedro P; Alonso MC; Borrego JJ; Dionísio L
J Water Health; 2010 Mar; 8(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20009243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enterococci as indicators of Lake Michigan recreational water quality: comparison of two methodologies and their impacts on public health regulatory events.
Kinzelman J; Ng C; Jackson E; Gradus S; Bagley R
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2003 Jan; 69(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 12513981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid detection of Escherichia coli and enterococci in recreational water using an immunomagnetic separation/adenosine triphosphate technique.
Bushon RN; Brady AM; Likirdopulos CA; Cireddu JV
J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 106(2):432-41. PubMed ID: 19200311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of rapid quantitative PCR-based and conventional culture-based methods for enumeration of Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli in recreational waters.
Noble RT; Blackwood AD; Griffith JF; McGee CD; Weisberg SB
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 Nov; 76(22):7437-43. PubMed ID: 20870786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cultivation-independent analysis of bacteria in IDEXX Quanti-Tray/2000 fecal indicator assays.
Sercu B; Van De Werfhorst LC; Murray JL; Holden PA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2011 Jan; 77(2):627-33. PubMed ID: 21097584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Specificity of a defined substrate method used to monitor balneability of tropical coastal waters impacted by polluted stormwater.
Sousa OV; Evangelista-Barreto NS; Catter KM; Fonteles-Filho AA; Macrae A; Fernandes Vieira RH
J Water Health; 2010 Sep; 8(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 20375483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Enterolert for enumeration of enterococci in recreational waters.
Budnick GE; Howard RT; Mayo DR
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 Oct; 62(10):3881-4. PubMed ID: 8837446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance and specificity of the covalently linked immunomagnetic separation-ATP method for rapid detection and enumeration of enterococci in coastal environments.
Zimmer-Faust AG; Thulsiraj V; Ferguson D; Jay JA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2014 May; 80(9):2705-14. PubMed ID: 24561583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Covalently linked immunomagnetic separation/adenosine triphosphate technique (Cov-IMS/ATP) enables rapid, in-field detection and quantification of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. in freshwater and marine environments.
Lee CM; Griffith JF; Kaiser W; Jay JA
J Appl Microbiol; 2010 Jul; 109(1):324-33. PubMed ID: 20102424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential decay and prediction of persistence of Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli culturable cells and molecular markers in freshwater and seawater environments.
Sagarduy M; Courtois S; Del Campo A; Garmendia JM; Petrau A
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2019 May; 222(4):695-704. PubMed ID: 31097324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification.
Dorevitch S; Shrestha A; DeFlorio-Barker S; Breitenbach C; Heimler I
Environ Health; 2017 May; 16(1):45. PubMed ID: 28499453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Standardization of enterococci density estimates by EPA qPCR methods and comparison of beach action value exceedances in river waters with culture methods.
Haugland RA; Siefring SD; Varma M; Dufour AP; Brenner KP; Wade TJ; Sams E; Cochran S; Braun S; Sivaganensan M
J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Oct; 105():59-66. PubMed ID: 25038459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of membrane filtration and multiple-tube fermentation by the colilert and enterolert methods for detection of waterborne coliform bacteria, Escherichia coli, and enterococci used in drinking and bathing water quality monitoring in southern sweden.
Eckner KF
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1998 Aug; 64(8):3079-83. PubMed ID: 9687478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of media for enumeration of coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli in non-disinfected water.
Pitkänen T; Paakkari P; Miettinen IT; Heinonen-Tanski H; Paulin L; Hänninen ML
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Mar; 68(3):522-9. PubMed ID: 17150268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the microbial quality of irrigation water in a prairie watershed.
Fremaux B; Boa T; Chaykowski A; Kasichayanula S; Gritzfeld J; Braul L; Yost C
J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 106(2):442-54. PubMed ID: 19054231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Escherichia coli, enterococci, and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron qPCR signals through wastewater and septage treatment.
Srinivasan S; Aslan A; Xagoraraki I; Alocilja E; Rose JB
Water Res; 2011 Apr; 45(8):2561-72. PubMed ID: 21420709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Holding-time and method comparisons for the analysis of fecal-indicator bacteria in groundwater.
Bushon RN; Brady AM; Lindsey BD
Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Nov; 187(11):672. PubMed ID: 26439125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microbial water quality before and after the repair of a failing onsite wastewater treatment system adjacent to coastal waters.
Conn KE; Habteselassie MY; Denene Blackwood A; Noble RT
J Appl Microbiol; 2012 Jan; 112(1):214-24. PubMed ID: 22032466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
