These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27213788)
1. Is There a Cosmetic Advantage to Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgical Techniques Over Standard Laparoscopic Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Evans L; Manley K Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Jun; 26(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 27213788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cosmetic outcomes following appendectomy in children: a comparison of surgical techniques. Chandler NM; Ghazarian SR; King TM; Danielson PD J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2014 Aug; 24(8):584-8. PubMed ID: 25062342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally Invasive, Laparoscopic, and Robotic-assisted Techniques Versus Open Techniques for Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review. Wagenaar S; Nederhoed JH; Hoksbergen AWJ; Bonjer HJ; Wisselink W; van Ramshorst GH Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):205-217. PubMed ID: 28262412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective comparative study of cosmetic satisfaction for three different surgical approaches. Song T; Park JY; Kim TJ; Lee YY; Choi CH; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jul; 190():48-51. PubMed ID: 25978858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aly OE; Black DH; Rehman H; Ahmed I Int J Surg; 2016 Nov; 35():120-128. PubMed ID: 27686264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single-Port Laparoscopy vs Conventional Laparoscopy in Benign Adnexal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Schmitt A; Crochet P; Knight S; Tourette C; Loundou A; Agostini A J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1083-1095. PubMed ID: 28705751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative cross-sectional study on cosmetic outcomes after single port or conventional laparoscopic surgery. Eom JM; Ko JH; Choi JS; Hong JH; Lee JH Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Mar; 167(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 23265299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The perceived cosmetic value of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. Ceccanti S; Mele E; Cozzi DA J Pediatr Surg; 2008 Aug; 43(8):1579-80; author reply 1580-1. PubMed ID: 18675661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient and parental scar assessment after single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: long-term follow-up from a prospective randomized trial. Gasior AC; Knott EM; Holcomb GW; Ostlie DJ; St Peter SD J Pediatr Surg; 2014 Jan; 49(1):120-2; discussion 122. PubMed ID: 24439594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early experience with single incision laparoscopic surgery: eliminating the scar from abdominal operations. Dutta S J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Sep; 44(9):1741-5. PubMed ID: 19735818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Successful treatment of a patient with an infected urachal remnant via single-incision laparoscopic surgery: Report of a case. Nakamura H; Oshita A; Imamura Y; Sasaki M; Kohyama M; Tazaki T; Sugiyama Y; Daimaru Y; Nakamitsu A Asian J Endosc Surg; 2016 Feb; 9(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 26781536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]