These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27217284)
1. Comparison of the force applied on oral structures during intubation attempts by novice physicians between the Macintosh direct laryngoscope, Airway Scope and C-MAC PM: a high-fidelity simulator-based study. Nakanishi T; Shiga T; Homma Y; Koyama Y; Goto T BMJ Open; 2016 May; 6(5):e011039. PubMed ID: 27217284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the force applied on oral structures during intubation attempts between the Pentax-AWS airwayscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope: a high-fidelity simulator-based study. Goto T; Koyama Y; Kondo T; Tsugawa Y; Hasegawa K BMJ Open; 2014 Oct; 4(10):e006416. PubMed ID: 25296656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of results from novice and trained personnel using the Macintosh laryngoscope, Pentax AWS®, C-MAC™ and Bonfils intubation fibrescope: a manikin study. Lye ST; Liaw CM; Seet E; Koh KF Singapore Med J; 2013 Feb; 54(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 23462828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Macintosh and Intubrite laryngoscopes for intubation performed by novice physicians in a difficult airway scenario. Szarpak L; Smereka J; Ladny JR Am J Emerg Med; 2017 May; 35(5):796-797. PubMed ID: 28139309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lower maximum forces on oral structures when using gum-elastic bougie than when using endotracheal tube and stylet during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy by novices: a crossover study using a high-fidelity simulator. Ono Y; Shinohara K; Shimada J; Inoue S; Kotani J BMC Emerg Med; 2020 May; 20(1):34. PubMed ID: 32375651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Randomized Comparison Simulating Face to Face Endotracheal Intubation of Pentax Airway Scope, C-MAC Video Laryngoscope, Glidescope Video Laryngoscope, and Macintosh Laryngoscope. Choi HY; Oh YM; Kang GH; Kang H; Jang YS; Kim W; Kim E; Cho YS; Choi H; Kim H; Kim GY Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():961782. PubMed ID: 26161424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ability of paramedics to perform endotracheal intubation during continuous chest compressions: a randomized cadaver study comparing Pentax AWS and Macintosh laryngoscopes. Truszewski Z; Czyzewski L; Smereka J; Krajewski P; Fudalej M; Madziala M; Szarpak L Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1835-9. PubMed ID: 27369468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Contact Force Exerted on Teeth by Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope Versus Video Laryngoscopes. Kato Y; Sakuma Y; Momota Y Anesth Prog; 2018; 65(3):151-155. PubMed ID: 30235428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Rigid Fiberscope with Direct Laryngoscopy in Easy and Difficult Airway Scenarios: A Manikin Study. Kaplan A; Göksu E; Yıldız G; Kılıç T J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 50(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 26725922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomised crossover trial comparing the Airtraq(®) NT, McGrath(®) MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation of simulated easy and difficult airways in a manikin. Gómez-Ríos MÁ; Pinegger S; de Carrillo Mantilla M; Vizcaino L; Barreto-Calvo P; Paech MJ; Gómez-Ríos D; López-Calviño B Braz J Anesthesiol; 2016; 66(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 27108827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the Glidescope, Pentax AWS, and Macintosh laryngoscopes when used by novice personnel: a manikin study. Malik MA; Hassett P; Carney J; Higgins BD; Harte BH; Laffey JG Can J Anaesth; 2009 Nov; 56(11):802-11. PubMed ID: 19655213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Direct and Video Laryngoscopes during Different Airway Scenarios Performed by Experienced Paramedics: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Study. Ruetzler K; Szarpak L; Smereka J; Dabrowski M; Bialka S; Mosteller L; Szarpak A; Ludwin K; Wojewodzka-Zelezniakowicz M; Ladny JR Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():5382739. PubMed ID: 32149114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the performance of traditional direct laryngoscope with three indirect laryngoscopes: A prospective manikin study in normal and difficult airway scenarios. Ong JR; Chong CF; Chen CC; Wang TL; Lin CM; Chang SC Emerg Med Australas; 2011 Oct; 23(5):606-14. PubMed ID: 21995476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the TruView PCD video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope for pediatric tracheal intubation by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover simulation trial. Szarpak Ł; Czyżewski Ł; Kurowski A; Truszewski Z Eur J Pediatr; 2015 Oct; 174(10):1325-32. PubMed ID: 25894914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins. McElwain J; Malik MA; Harte BH; Flynn NM; Laffey JG Anaesthesia; 2010 May; 65(5):483-9. PubMed ID: 20337620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of Pentax airway scope versus Macintosh laryngoscope when used by novice personnel: A prospective randomized controlled study. Kim KN; Jeong MA; Oh YN; Kim SY; Kim JY J Int Med Res; 2018 Jan; 46(1):258-271. PubMed ID: 28835153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Airtraq Laryngoscope Versus the Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope During Pediatric Intubation Performed by Nurses: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study With Three Airway Scenarios. Szarpak Ł; Karczewska K; Czyżewski Ł; Truszewski Z; Kurowski A Pediatr Emerg Care; 2017 Nov; 33(11):735-739. PubMed ID: 27228145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tracheal intubation of a difficult airway using Airway Scope, Airtraq, and Macintosh laryngoscope: a comparative manikin study of inexperienced personnel. Liu L; Tanigawa K; Kusunoki S; Tamura T; Ota K; Yamaga S; Kida Y; Otani T; Sadamori T; Takeda T; Iwasaki Y; Hirohashi N Anesth Analg; 2010 Apr; 110(4):1049-55. PubMed ID: 20357149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of five video-assisted intubation devices by novice and expert laryngoscopists for use in the aeromedical evacuation environment. Wallace MC; Britton ST; Meek R; Walsh-Hart S; Carter CTE; Lisco SJ Mil Med Res; 2017; 4():20. PubMed ID: 28630743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]