These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27217394)

  • 21. Methodological issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies in orthopaedic research.
    Simunovic N; Sprague S; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 May; 91 Suppl 3():87-94. PubMed ID: 19411505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.
    Burton M; Clarke M
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):101-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16442423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Askie L; Offringa M
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Dec; 20(6):403-9. PubMed ID: 26515266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinician's guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Feldstein DA
    WMJ; 2005 Apr; 104(3):25-9. PubMed ID: 15966628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when they are useful and when to be careful.
    Noordzij M; Hooft L; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Kidney Int; 2009 Dec; 76(11):1130-6. PubMed ID: 19727062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Akobeng AK
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Aug; 90(8):845-8. PubMed ID: 16040886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    McKenzie JE; Beller EM; Forbes AB
    Respirology; 2016 May; 21(4):626-37. PubMed ID: 27099100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evidence-based decision-making 2: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Bello A; Wiebe N; Garg A; Tonelli M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():397-416. PubMed ID: 25694324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Systematic reviews: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
    Yuan Y; Hunt RH
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 May; 104(5):1086-92. PubMed ID: 19417748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [How to assess the quality of systematic review and meta-analysis].
    Zhang JH; Shang HC; Zhang BL
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Apr; 6(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 18405597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Under the meta-scope: possibilities and limits of meta-analyses].
    Egger M
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1998 Nov; 128(48):1893-901. PubMed ID: 9879617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How to read a nephrology systematic review.
    Palmer SC; Navaneethan SD; Strippoli GF
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Mar; 15(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 20470273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Quality of the Evidence According to GRADE Is Predominantly Low or Very Low in Oral Health Systematic Reviews.
    Pandis N; Fleming PS; Worthington H; Salanti G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131644. PubMed ID: 26162076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
    Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: how should they be performed, evaluated and used?].
    Gisbert JP; Bonfil X
    Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Mar; 27(3):129-49. PubMed ID: 14998465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Methods of meta-analysis: an analysis.
    Koretz RL
    Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care; 2002 Sep; 5(5):467-74. PubMed ID: 12172468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations.
    Zwahlen M; Renehan A; Egger M
    Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 18452828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Basic knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of an important tool for healthcare professionals].
    Schnabel A; Kranke P
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2010 Jul; 45(7-8):510-8. PubMed ID: 20665362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.