328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27217972)
21. Effect of viewing mode on pathfinding in immersive Virtual Reality.
White PJ; Byagowi A; Moussavi Z
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():4619-22. PubMed ID: 26737323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Measuring Virtual Reality Headset Resolution and Field of View: Implications for Vision Care Applications.
Lynn MH; Luo G; Tomasi M; Pundlik S; E Houston K
Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Aug; 97(8):573-582. PubMed ID: 32769841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Digital vs traditional: Are diagnostic accuracy rates similar for glass slides vs whole slide images in a non-gynaecological external quality assurance setting?
Ross J; Greaves J; Earls P; Shulruf B; Van Es SL
Cytopathology; 2018 Aug; 29(4):326-334. PubMed ID: 29665117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development and evaluation of the virtual pathology slide: a new tool in telepathology.
Costello SS; Johnston DJ; Dervan PA; O'Shea DG
J Med Internet Res; 2003; 5(2):e11. PubMed ID: 12857667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Whole Slide Images in Artificial Intelligence Applications in Digital Pathology: Challenges and Pitfalls.
Basak K; Ozyoruk KB; Demir D
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2023; 39(2):101-108. PubMed ID: 36951221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Digital Whole Slide Imaging Compared With Light Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology.
Borowsky AD; Glassy EF; Wallace WD; Kallichanda NS; Behling CA; Miller DV; Oswal HN; Feddersen RM; Bakhtar OR; Mendoza AE; Molden DP; Saffer HL; Wixom CR; Albro JE; Cessna MH; Hall BJ; Lloyd IE; Bishop JW; Darrow MA; Gui D; Jen KY; Walby JAS; Bauer SM; Cortez DA; Gandhi P; Rodgers MM; Rodriguez RA; Martin DR; McConnell TG; Reynolds SJ; Spigel JH; Stepenaskie SA; Viktorova E; Magari R; Wharton KA; Qiu J; Bauer TW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 Oct; 144(10):1245-1253. PubMed ID: 32057275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic Validation of a Whole-Slide Imaging Scanner in Cytological Samples: Diagnostic Accuracy and Comparison With Light Microscopy.
Bonsembiante F; Bonfanti U; Cian F; Cavicchioli L; Zattoni B; Gelain ME
Vet Pathol; 2019 May; 56(3):429-434. PubMed ID: 30686128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Routine Digital Pathology Workflow: The Catania Experience.
Fraggetta F; Garozzo S; Zannoni GF; Pantanowitz L; Rossi ED
J Pathol Inform; 2017; 8():51. PubMed ID: 29416914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of Whole Slide Imaging for primary surgical pathology diagnosis of prostate biopsies.
Rao V; Subramanian P; Sali AP; Menon S; Desai SB
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2021; 64(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 33433413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An array microscope for ultrarapid virtual slide processing and telepathology. Design, fabrication, and validation study.
Weinstein RS; Descour MR; Liang C; Barker G; Scott KM; Richter L; Krupinski EA; Bhattacharyya AK; Davis JR; Graham AR; Rennels M; Russum WC; Goodall JF; Zhou P; Olszak AG; Williams BH; Wyant JC; Bartels PH
Hum Pathol; 2004 Nov; 35(11):1303-14. PubMed ID: 15668886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnosing Pathological Prognostic Factors in Retinoblastoma: Correlation between Traditional Microscopy and Digital Slides.
Zoroquiain P; Logan P; Bravo-Filho V; Vila N; Jabbour S; Orellana ME; Burnier MN
Ocul Oncol Pathol; 2015 Jun; 1(4):259-65. PubMed ID: 27354984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Experience Reviewing Digital Pap Tests using a Gallery of Images.
Pantanowitz L; Harrington S
J Pathol Inform; 2021; 12():7. PubMed ID: 34012711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Usability Comparisons of Head-Mounted vs. Stereoscopic Desktop Displays in a Virtual Reality Environment with Pain Patients.
Tong X; Gromala D; Gupta D; Squire P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 220():424-31. PubMed ID: 27046617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic Accuracy of Virtual Pathology vs Traditional Microscopy in a Large Dermatopathology Study.
Kent MN; Olsen TG; Feeser TA; Tesno KC; Moad JC; Conroy MP; Kendrick MJ; Stephenson SR; Murchland MR; Khan AU; Peacock EA; Brumfiel A; Bottomley MA
JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Dec; 153(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 29049424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Whole Slide Imaging Technology and Its Applications: Current and Emerging Perspectives.
Jain E; Patel A; Parwani AV; Shafi S; Brar Z; Sharma S; Mohanty SK
Int J Surg Pathol; 2024 May; 32(3):433-448. PubMed ID: 37437093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Oculus Rift and HTC Vive: Feasibility for Virtual Reality-Based Exploration, Navigation, Exergaming, and Rehabilitation.
Borrego A; Latorre J; Alcañiz M; Llorens R
Games Health J; 2018 Jun; 7(3):151-156. PubMed ID: 29293369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Development and use of a genitourinary pathology digital teaching set for trainee education.
Li L; Dangott BJ; Parwani AV
J Pathol Inform; 2010 May; 1():. PubMed ID: 20805961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Remote Reporting During a Pandemic Using Digital Pathology Solution: Experience from a Tertiary Care Cancer Center.
Ramaswamy V; Tejaswini BN; Uthaiah SB
J Pathol Inform; 2021; 12():20. PubMed ID: 34267985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy.
Stepan K; Zeiger J; Hanchuk S; Del Signore A; Shrivastava R; Govindaraj S; Iloreta A
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2017 Oct; 7(10):1006-1013. PubMed ID: 28719062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of multiple whole slide imaging scanners based on the guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.
Thrall MJ; Wimmer JL; Schwartz MR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 May; 139(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 25927149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
