These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2721827)

  • 1. Identification of synthetic vowels by patients using the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF; Dankowski K; McCandless G; Smith L
    Ear Hear; 1989 Feb; 10(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 2721827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The recognition of vowels differing by a single formant by cochlear-implant subjects.
    Tyler RS; Tye-Murray N; Otto SR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2107-12. PubMed ID: 2532227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word recognition by 50 patients fitted with the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF; Hannley MT; Dankowski K; Smith L; McCandless G
    Ear Hear; 1989 Feb; 10(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 2721828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Synthetic vowel studies on cochlear implant patients.
    Tong YC; Lim HH; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):876-87. PubMed ID: 3183206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vowel and consonant recognition with the aid of a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF; Dankowski K; McCandless G; Parkin JL; Smith L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):585-601. PubMed ID: 1775658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC; Poroy O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual "vowel spaces" of cochlear implant users: implications for the study of auditory adaptation to spectral shift.
    Harnsberger JD; Svirsky MA; Kaiser AR; Pisoni DB; Wright R; Meyer TA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2135-45. PubMed ID: 11386565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phoneme recognition and confusions with multichannel cochlear implants: vowels.
    Välimaa TT; Määttä TK; Löppönen HJ; Sorri MJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Oct; 45(5):1039-54. PubMed ID: 12381059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification and multiplicity of double vowels in cochlear implant users.
    Kwon BJ; Perry TT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1983-96. PubMed ID: 24879064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vowel perception: experiments with a single-electrode cochlear implant.
    Doyle KJ; Danhauer JL; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 3755193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vowel and consonant identification tests can be used to compare performances in a multilingual group of cochlear implant patients.
    Pelizzone M; Boëx C; Montandon P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1993; 55(6):341-6. PubMed ID: 8265119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory/phonetic categorization with the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF; Hannley MT; McCandless GA; Smith LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Aug; 84(2):501-10. PubMed ID: 3170943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory consonant and word recognition skills of cochlear implant users.
    Tye-Murray N; Tyler RS
    Ear Hear; 1989 Oct; 10(5):292-8. PubMed ID: 2792582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Synthetic two-formant vowel perception by some of the better cochlear-implant patients.
    Tyler RS; Tye-Murray N; Moore BC; McCabe BF
    Audiology; 1989; 28(6):301-15. PubMed ID: 2532003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vowel perception strategies of normal-hearing subjects and patients using Nucleus multichannel and 3M/House cochlear implants.
    Tartter VC; Hellman SA; Chute PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1269-83. PubMed ID: 1401515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancing the speech envelope of continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants.
    Geurts L; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Apr; 105(4):2476-84. PubMed ID: 10212428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patterns of phoneme perception errors by listeners with cochlear implants as a function of overall speech perception ability.
    Munson B; Donaldson GS; Allen SL; Collison EA; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):925-35. PubMed ID: 12597186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.