These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2721827)

  • 41. Acoustic correlates of the front/back vowel distinction: a comparison of transition onset versus "steady state".
    Sussman HM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 2380450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Performance of some of the better cochlear-implant patients.
    Tyler RS; Moore BC; Kuk FK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):887-911. PubMed ID: 2601319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Variables affecting implant performance in children.
    Miyamoto RT; Osberger MJ; Todd SL; Robbins AM; Stroer BS; Zimmerman-Phillips S; Carney AE
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Sep; 104(9):1120-4. PubMed ID: 8072359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Similarities of vowels in nonreverberant and reverberant fields.
    Nábĕlek AK; Letowski TR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 May; 83(5):1891-9. PubMed ID: 3403805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Initial Iowa results with the multichannel cochlear implant from Melbourne.
    Tyler RS; Lowder MW; Otto SR; Preece JP; Gantz BJ; McCabe BF
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 27(4):596-604. PubMed ID: 6549200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Acoustic cues for consonant identification by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF; Soli S; Dankowski K; Smith LM; McCandless G; Parkin J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Nov; 88(5):2074-9. PubMed ID: 2269723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Speech recognition ability as a function of duration of deafness in multichannel cochlear implant patients.
    Shea JJ; Domico EH; Orchik DJ
    Laryngoscope; 1990 Mar; 100(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 2308444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Identification of high-pass filtered male, female, and child vowels: The use of high-frequency cues.
    Donai JJ; Paschall DD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):1971-82. PubMed ID: 25920848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Speech perception with a single-channel cochlear implant: a comparison with a single-channel tactile device.
    Carney AE; Kienle M; Miyamoto RT
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 2141660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Consonant recognition as a function of the number of channels of stimulation by patients who use the Symbion cochlear implant.
    Dorman M; Dankowski K; McCandless G; Smith L
    Ear Hear; 1989 Oct; 10(5):288-91. PubMed ID: 2792581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A Comparison of Persian Vowel Production in Hearing-Impaired Children Using a Cochlear Implant and Normal-Hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Drinnan M; Mohamadi R; Yadegari F; Nourbakhsh M; Torabinezhad F
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 25990321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effect of age at onset of deafness on children's speech perception abilities with a cochlear implant.
    Osberger MJ; Todd SL; Berry SW; Robbins AM; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1991 Nov; 100(11):883-8. PubMed ID: 1746820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Low-pass filtering in amplitude modulation detection associated with vowel and consonant identification in subjects with cochlear implants.
    Cazals Y; Pelizzone M; Saudan O; Boex C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2048-54. PubMed ID: 7963020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Linear phoneme boundaries for German synthetic two-formant vowels.
    Hose B; Langner G; Scheich H
    Hear Res; 1983 Jan; 9(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 6219082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Perception of nonlinear and linear formant trajectories.
    Nábĕlek AK; Ovchinnikov A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jan; 101(1):488-97. PubMed ID: 9000739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Objective evaluation of vowel identification with the Digisonic cochlear implant.
    Serniclaes W; De Guchteneere R; Secqueville T; Bachelot G; Génin J; Meyer B; Chouard CH
    Audiology; 1996; 35(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 8790868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Cochlear implants in post-lingually deafened patients.
    Hiraumi H; Tsuji J; Kanemaru S; Fujino K; Ito J
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Feb; (557):17-21. PubMed ID: 17453437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Perception and confusion of speech sounds by adults with a cochlear implant.
    Rødvik AK
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008; 22(4-5):371-8. PubMed ID: 18415737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted vowels: training with nonlexical labels.
    Li T; Fu QJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17131213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.