These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2721828)

  • 1. Word recognition by 50 patients fitted with the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF; Hannley MT; Dankowski K; Smith L; McCandless G
    Ear Hear; 1989 Feb; 10(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 2721828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of some of the better cochlear-implant patients.
    Tyler RS; Moore BC; Kuk FK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):887-911. PubMed ID: 2601319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of synthetic vowels by patients using the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF; Dankowski K; McCandless G; Smith L
    Ear Hear; 1989 Feb; 10(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 2721827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects.
    Zwolan TA; Collins LM; Wakefield GH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Dec; 102(6):3673-85. PubMed ID: 9407659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient performance with two types of multiple electrode intracochlear implant.
    Teig E; Lindeman HH; Flottorp G; Tvete O; Hanche-Olsen S; Arntsen O
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 1641578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory consonant and word recognition skills of cochlear implant users.
    Tye-Murray N; Tyler RS
    Ear Hear; 1989 Oct; 10(5):292-8. PubMed ID: 2792582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative speech recognition results in eight subjects using two different coding strategies with the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant.
    von Wallenberg EL; Battmer RD
    Br J Audiol; 1991 Dec; 25(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 1773197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech recognition ability as a function of duration of deafness in multichannel cochlear implant patients.
    Shea JJ; Domico EH; Orchik DJ
    Laryngoscope; 1990 Mar; 100(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 2308444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual and production abilities in profoundly deaf children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Staller SJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Jan; 1(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 2132576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of 3M/house cochlear implant users on tests of speech perception.
    Danhauer JL; Ghadialy FB; Eskwitt DL; Mendel LL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Oct; 1(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 2132608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Roland JT
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition in background noise of cochlear implant patients.
    Fetterman BL; Domico EH
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2002 Mar; 126(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 11956533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear implants in children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults: speech perception.
    Dawson PW; Blamey PJ; Rowland LC; Dettman SJ; Clark GM; Busby PA; Brown AM; Dowell RC; Rickards FW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):401-17. PubMed ID: 1573879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of lexical characteristics and demographic factors on mandarin chinese open-set word recognition in children with cochlear implants.
    Liu H; Liu S; Wang S; Liu C; Kong Y; Zhang N; Li S; Yang Y; Han D; Zhang L
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 23086423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variables affecting implant performance in children.
    Miyamoto RT; Osberger MJ; Todd SL; Robbins AM; Stroer BS; Zimmerman-Phillips S; Carney AE
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Sep; 104(9):1120-4. PubMed ID: 8072359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?
    Moberly AC; Harris MS; Boyce L; Vasil K; Wucinich T; Pisoni DB; Baxter J; Ray C; Shafiro V
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Apr; 128(4):959-966. PubMed ID: 28776711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.