194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27219108)
1. Second-opinion interpretations of neuroimaging studies by oncologic neuroradiologists can help reduce errors in cancer care.
Hatzoglou V; Omuro AM; Haque S; Khakoo Y; Ganly I; Oh JH; Shukla-Dave A; Fatovic R; Gaal J; Holodny AI
Cancer; 2016 Sep; 122(17):2708-14. PubMed ID: 27219108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Second-Opinion Interpretations of Gynecologic Oncologic MRI Examinations by Sub-Specialized Radiologists Influence Patient Care.
Lakhman Y; D'Anastasi M; Miccò M; Scelzo C; Vargas HA; Nougaret S; Sosa RE; Chi DS; Abu-Rustum NR; Hricak H; Sala E
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2089-98. PubMed ID: 26494640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Second-Opinion Subspecialty Consultations in Musculoskeletal Radiology.
Chalian M; Del Grande F; Thakkar RS; Jalali SF; Chhabra A; Carrino JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1217-21. PubMed ID: 27058462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Second opinion interpretations by specialty radiologists at a pediatric hospital: rate of disagreement and clinical implications.
Eakins C; Ellis WD; Pruthi S; Johnson DP; Hernanz-Schulman M; Yu C; Kan JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Oct; 199(4):916-20. PubMed ID: 22997387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Second-opinion consultations in neuroradiology.
Zan E; Yousem DM; Carone M; Lewin JS
Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 20308451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosis of Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer on Prostate MRI: Impact of Second-Opinion Readings by Subspecialized Genitourinary Oncologic Radiologists.
Wibmer A; Vargas HA; Donahue TF; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Eastham J; Sala E; Hricak H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):W73-8. PubMed ID: 26102421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The clinical impact of subspecialized radiologist reinterpretation of abdominal imaging studies, with analysis of the types and relative frequency of interpretation discrepancies.
Lindgren EA; Patel MD; Wu Q; Melikian J; Hara AK
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Oct; 39(5):1119-26. PubMed ID: 24748211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of neuroradiologist second opinion on staging and management of head and neck cancer.
Lysack JT; Hoy M; Hudon ME; Nakoneshny SC; Chandarana SP; Matthews TW; Dort JC
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jun; 42(1):39. PubMed ID: 23739037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical importance of re-interpretation of PET/CT scanning in patients referred to a tertiary care medical centre.
Löfgren J; Loft A; Barbosa de Lima VA; Østerlind K; von Benzon E; Højgaard L
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2017 Mar; 37(2):143-147. PubMed ID: 26211508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of neuroimaging team meetings for patients in a district general hospital.
McCarron M; Wade C; Flynn P; McVerry F
Clin Med (Lond); 2018 Jun; 18(3):206-211. PubMed ID: 29858429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Formal reporting of second-opinion CT interpretation: experience and reimbursement in the emergency department setting.
Jeffers AB; Saghir A; Camacho M
Emerg Radiol; 2012 Jun; 19(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 22246582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of second opinion surgical pathology on the practice of head and neck surgery: a decade experience at a large referral hospital.
Westra WH; Kronz JD; Eisele DW
Head Neck; 2002 Jul; 24(7):684-93. PubMed ID: 12112543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The value of specialist oncological radiology review of cross-sectional imaging.
Loughrey GJ; Carrington BM; Anderson H; Dobson MJ; Lo Ying Ping F
Clin Radiol; 1999 Mar; 54(3):149-54; discussion 154-5. PubMed ID: 10201861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of specialist neuroradiology second opinion reporting: is there added value?
Briggs GM; Flynn PA; Worthington M; Rennie I; McKinstry CS
Clin Radiol; 2008 Jul; 63(7):791-5. PubMed ID: 18555037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality--a radiology imperative: interpretation accuracy and pertinence.
Lee JK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 17412256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpretation of head CT scans in the emergency department by fellows versus general staff non-neuroradiologists: a closer look at the effectiveness of a quality control program.
Le AH; Licurse A; Catanzano TM
Emerg Radiol; 2007 Oct; 14(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 17605056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiologist-initiated double reading of abdominal CT: retrospective analysis of the clinical importance of changes to radiology reports.
Lauritzen PM; Andersen JG; Stokke MV; Tennstrand AL; Aamodt R; Heggelund T; Dahl FA; Sandbæk G; Hurlen P; Gulbrandsen P
BMJ Qual Saf; 2016 Aug; 25(8):595-603. PubMed ID: 27013638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neuroimaging in patients referred to a neuro-ophthalmology service: the rates of appropriateness and concordance in interpretation.
McClelland C; Van Stavern GP; Shepherd JB; Gordon M; Huecker J
Ophthalmology; 2012 Aug; 119(8):1701-4. PubMed ID: 22484117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Discrepancies in Mandatory Slide Review of Extradepartmental Head and Neck Cases: Experience at a Large Academic Center.
Mehrad M; Chernock RD; El-Mofty SK; Lewis JS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Dec; 139(12):1539-45. PubMed ID: 26619026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
