291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27219108)
21. Value of second-opinion review of outside institution PET-CT examinations.
Ulaner GA; Mannelli L; Dunphy M
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Apr; 38(4):306-311. PubMed ID: 28291158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The value of neuroimaging team meetings for patients in a district general hospital.
McCarron M; Wade C; Flynn P; McVerry F
Clin Med (Lond); 2018 Jun; 18(3):206-211. PubMed ID: 29858429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Providing second-opinion interpretations of pediatric imaging: embracing the call for value-added medicine.
Sammer MBK; Kan JH
Pediatr Radiol; 2021 Apr; 51(4):523-528. PubMed ID: 33743036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Formal reporting of second-opinion CT interpretation: experience and reimbursement in the emergency department setting.
Jeffers AB; Saghir A; Camacho M
Emerg Radiol; 2012 Jun; 19(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 22246582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Specialized Second Opinion Review of Breast MRI Impacts Management and Increases Cancer Detection.
Weinfurtner RJ; Mooney B; Forbus J
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jul; 16(7):922-927. PubMed ID: 30833163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radiologic head CT interpretation errors in pediatric abusive and non-abusive head trauma patients.
Kralik SF; Finke W; Wu IC; Hibbard RA; Hicks RA; Ho CY
Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Jul; 47(8):942-951. PubMed ID: 28497263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of second opinion surgical pathology on the practice of head and neck surgery: a decade experience at a large referral hospital.
Westra WH; Kronz JD; Eisele DW
Head Neck; 2002 Jul; 24(7):684-93. PubMed ID: 12112543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The value of specialist oncological radiology review of cross-sectional imaging.
Loughrey GJ; Carrington BM; Anderson H; Dobson MJ; Lo Ying Ping F
Clin Radiol; 1999 Mar; 54(3):149-54; discussion 154-5. PubMed ID: 10201861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Second-Opinion Review of Breast Imaging at a Cancer Center: Is It Worthwhile?
Coffey K; D'Alessio D; Keating DM; Morris EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1386-1391. PubMed ID: 28301207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The role of specialist neuroradiology second opinion reporting: is there added value?
Briggs GM; Flynn PA; Worthington M; Rennie I; McKinstry CS
Clin Radiol; 2008 Jul; 63(7):791-5. PubMed ID: 18555037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of outside radiologists' reports of computed tomography exams of emergently transferred patients.
Robinson JD; Linnau KF; Hippe DS; Sheehan KL; Gross JA
Emerg Radiol; 2018 Apr; 25(2):169-173. PubMed ID: 29282579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Second-Opinion Reads in Interstitial Lung Disease Imaging: Added Value of Subspecialty Interpretation.
Filev PD; Little BP; Duong PT
J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Jun; 17(6):786-790. PubMed ID: 31930981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Second-opinion interpretation of outside facility general ultrasound studies: rate of discrepancies and management change.
Mehrsheikh AL; Strnad BS; Shetty AS; Itani M
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Aug; 48(8):2716-2723. PubMed ID: 37256331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Unread Second-Opinion Radiology Reports: A Potential Waste of Health Care Resources.
Heinz SA; Kwee TC; Yakar D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Oct; 215(4):934-939. PubMed ID: 32783557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Quality--a radiology imperative: interpretation accuracy and pertinence.
Lee JK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 17412256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Repeat Breast Ultrasound Demonstrates Utility with Added Cancer Detection in Patients following Breast Imaging Second Opinion Recommendations.
Jared Weinfurtner R; Mallory MA; Bermudez D
Breast J; 2022; 2022():1561455. PubMed ID: 35711880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Recommendations for additional imaging of abdominal imaging examinations: frequency, benefit, and cost.
Heinz SA; Kwee TC; Yakar D
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1137-1144. PubMed ID: 31451972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Interpretation of head CT scans in the emergency department by fellows versus general staff non-neuroradiologists: a closer look at the effectiveness of a quality control program.
Le AH; Licurse A; Catanzano TM
Emerg Radiol; 2007 Oct; 14(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 17605056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Radiologist-initiated double reading of abdominal CT: retrospective analysis of the clinical importance of changes to radiology reports.
Lauritzen PM; Andersen JG; Stokke MV; Tennstrand AL; Aamodt R; Heggelund T; Dahl FA; Sandbæk G; Hurlen P; Gulbrandsen P
BMJ Qual Saf; 2016 Aug; 25(8):595-603. PubMed ID: 27013638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
