291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27219108)
41. Clinical importance of second-opinion interpretations by radiologists specializing in gynecologic oncology at a tertiary cancer center: magnetic resonance imaging for endometrial cancer staging.
Alves I; Cunha TM
Radiol Bras; 2018; 51(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 29559763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Ensuring Appropriateness of Pediatric Second Opinion Consultations.
Glavis-Bloom J; Yang U; Nahl D; Goodarzian F; Sura A
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2020; 49(2):82-84. PubMed ID: 31147095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Neuroimaging in patients referred to a neuro-ophthalmology service: the rates of appropriateness and concordance in interpretation.
McClelland C; Van Stavern GP; Shepherd JB; Gordon M; Huecker J
Ophthalmology; 2012 Aug; 119(8):1701-4. PubMed ID: 22484117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Diagnostic Discrepancies in Mandatory Slide Review of Extradepartmental Head and Neck Cases: Experience at a Large Academic Center.
Mehrad M; Chernock RD; El-Mofty SK; Lewis JS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Dec; 139(12):1539-45. PubMed ID: 26619026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Neuroimaging reports in a general hospital: results from a quality-improvement program.
McCarron MO; Sands C; McCarron P
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2010 Jan; 112(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 19910106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Optimising neuroimaging effectiveness in a district general hospital.
McCarron MO; Wade C; McCarron P
J R Coll Physicians Edinb; 2014; 44(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 24995441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center.
Carney E; Kempf J; DeCarvalho V; Yudd A; Nosher J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 12876012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Reinterpretation of cross-sectional images in patients with head and neck cancer in the setting of a multidisciplinary cancer center.
Loevner LA; Sonners AI; Schulman BJ; Slawek K; Weber RS; Rosenthal DI; Moonis G; Chalian AA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2002; 23(10):1622-6. PubMed ID: 12427610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effectiveness of second-opinion radiology consultations to reassess the cervical spine CT scans: a study on trauma patients referred to a tertiary-care hospital.
Khalilzadeh O; Rahimian M; Batchu V; Vadvala HV; Novelline RA; Choy G
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(5):423-7. PubMed ID: 26200483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital.
Kronz JD; Westra WH; Epstein JI
Cancer; 1999 Dec; 86(11):2426-35. PubMed ID: 10590387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Trainee misinterpretations on pediatric neuroimaging studies: classification, imaging analysis, and outcome assessment.
Guimaraes CV; Leach JL; Jones BV
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2011 Oct; 32(9):1591-9. PubMed ID: 21835948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Volume and impact of second-opinion consultations by radiologists at a tertiary care cancer center: data.
DiPiro PJ; vanSonnenberg E; Tumeh SS; Ros PR
Acad Radiol; 2002 Dec; 9(12):1430-3. PubMed ID: 12553355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Subspecialty Second-Opinion in Multiple Myeloma CT: Emphasis on Clinically Significant Lytic Lesions.
Tagliafico AS; Belgioia L; Bonsignore A; Rossi F; Succio G; Bignotti B; Dominietto A
Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Apr; 56(4):. PubMed ID: 32340143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Quality outcomes of reinterpretation of brain CT studies by subspecialty experts in stroke imaging.
Jordan YJ; Jordan JE; Lightfoote JB; Ragland KD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1365-70. PubMed ID: 23169731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Incidental abdominopelvic findings on expanded field-of-view lumbar spinal MRI: frequency, clinical importance, and concordance in interpretation by neuroimaging and body imaging radiologists.
Maxwell AW; Keating DP; Nickerson JP
Clin Radiol; 2015 Feb; 70(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 25439794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Clinical importance of reinterpretation of body CT scans obtained elsewhere in patients referred for care at a tertiary cancer center.
Gollub MJ; Panicek DM; Bach AM; Penalver A; Castellino RA
Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 9885595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Recommendations in Second Opinion Reports of Neurologic Head and Neck Imaging: Frequency, Referring Clinicians' Compliance, and Diagnostic Yield.
Heinz SA; Yakar D; Dierckx RAJO; Lamers MJ; Kwee TC
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2021 Sep; 42(9):1676-1682. PubMed ID: 34244129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Discrepancy Rates and Clinical Impact of Imaging Secondary Interpretations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Rosenkrantz AB; Duszak R; Babb JS; Glover M; Kang SK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Sep; 15(9):1222-1231. PubMed ID: 30031614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
Ruchman RB; Jaeger J; Wiggins EF; Seinfeld S; Thakral V; Bolla S; Wallach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17715095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Sestamibi imaging for primary hyperparathyroidism: the impact of surgeon interpretation and radiologist volume.
Zia S; Sippel RS; Chen H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3827-31. PubMed ID: 22868920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
