These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27219736)

  • 1. A Comparative Study Between Patient-Specific Instrumentation and Conventional Technique in TKA.
    Lee SH; Song EK; Seon JK; Seol YJ; Prakash J; Lee WG
    Orthopedics; 2016 May; 39(3 Suppl):S83-7. PubMed ID: 27219736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-specific instrumentation improved mechanical alignment, while early clinical outcome was comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKA.
    Anderl W; Pauzenberger L; Kölblinger R; Kiesselbach G; Brandl G; Laky B; Kriegleder B; Heuberer P; Schwameis E
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Jan; 24(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 25326759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stability and alignment do not improve by using patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kosse NM; Heesterbeek PJC; Schimmel JJP; van Hellemondt GG; Wymenga AB; Defoort KC
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jun; 26(6):1792-1799. PubMed ID: 29181560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted surgery, and manual instrumentation: a short-term follow-up study.
    Yaffe M; Luo M; Goyal N; Chan P; Patel A; Cayo M; Stulberg SD
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 Sep; 9(5):837-44. PubMed ID: 24337791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve alignment in total knee arthroplasty.
    Russell R; Brown T; Huo M; Jones R
    J Knee Surg; 2014 Dec; 27(6):501-4. PubMed ID: 24504637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved.
    Sassoon A; Nam D; Nunley R; Barrack R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 25059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The John Insall Award: No Functional Benefit After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Patient-specific Instrumentation: A Randomized Trial.
    Ollivier M; Parratte S; Lunebourg A; Viehweger E; Argenson JN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 25791446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yan CH; Chiu KY; Ng FY; Chan PK; Fang CX
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Dec; 23(12):3637-45. PubMed ID: 25217311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized controlled clinical and radiological trial about outcomes of navigation-assisted TKA compared to conventional TKA: long-term follow-up.
    Song EK; Agrawal PR; Kim SK; Seo HY; Seon JK
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3381-3386. PubMed ID: 26831857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient-specific instrumentation development in TKA: 1st and 2nd generation designs in comparison with conventional instrumentation.
    Kwon OR; Kang KT; Son J; Suh DS; Heo DB; Koh YG
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Jan; 137(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 28005167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postoperative alignment of TKA in patients with severe preoperative varus or valgus deformity: is there a difference between surgical techniques?
    Rahm S; Camenzind RS; Hingsammer A; Lenz C; Bauer DE; Farshad M; Fucentese SF
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jun; 18(1):272. PubMed ID: 28637433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No evidence of superiority in reducing outliers of component alignment for patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.
    Zhang QM; Chen JY; Li H; Chai W; Ni M; Zhang ZD; Yang F
    Orthop Surg; 2015 Feb; 7(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 25708031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: What Is the Evidence?
    Szczech B; McDermott JD; Issa K; Rifai A; Festa A; Matarese WA; McInerney VK
    J Knee Surg; 2016 May; 29(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 26378906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA.
    Song EK; Seon JK; Yim JH; Netravali NA; Bargar WL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Jan; 471(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 22669549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The MyKnee® patient-specific system. Rationale, Technique and Results].
    Anderl W; Pauzenberger L; Schwameis E
    Orthopade; 2016 Apr; 45(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 27025868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of MRI-based vs. CT-based patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.
    An VV; Sivakumar BS; Phan K; Levy YD; Bruce WJ
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 Jan; 22(1):116-120. PubMed ID: 27823847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revision of partial knee to total knee arthroplasty with use of patient-specific instruments results in acceptable femoral rotation.
    Schotanus MGM; Thijs E; Boonen B; Kerens B; Jong B; Kort NP
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jun; 26(6):1656-1661. PubMed ID: 28785788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of computer-navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty in patients with Ranawat type-II valgus deformity: medium-term clinical and radiological results.
    Huang TW; Lee CY; Lin SJ; Peng KT; Huang KC; Lee MS; Hsu RW; Shen WJ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Nov; 15():390. PubMed ID: 25416446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of custom cutting guides based on three-dimensional computerized CT-scan planning and a conventional ancillary system based on two-dimensional planning in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sariali E; Kajetanek C; Catonné Y
    Int Orthop; 2019 Nov; 43(11):2529-2538. PubMed ID: 31227853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-Navigated versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Functional Outcomes from Level I and II Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Chin BZ; Seck VMH; Syn NL; Wee IJY; Tan SSH; O'Neill GK
    J Knee Surg; 2021 May; 34(6):648-658. PubMed ID: 31683347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.