These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Simple and functional--an impression method for the distal extension RPD. Stillwell KD Todays FDA; 2009 Jun; 21(6):14-7. PubMed ID: 19663052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Use of polyvinyl siloxane material for an altered cast impression tray. Hsu YT J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):695-6. PubMed ID: 24657176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Accurate impression technique: a key to successful prosthetics. Rubinstein S Dent Today; 2010 Oct; 29(10):154-7. PubMed ID: 21086806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions. Cura C; Isik FG; Dundar M Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Making a great impression. Mechanic E Dent Today; 2010 Dec; 29(12):88, 90-1. PubMed ID: 21229926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials. Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Use of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material to correct a defect in complete denture definitive impressions. Oh WS; Park JM J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):255-6. PubMed ID: 25444280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Impression trifecta: three tools and tips for better impressions. Gottlieb M; Fagin M Todays FDA; 2011; 23(3):57-61. PubMed ID: 21568211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impression technique for ovate pontics. de Vasconcellos DK; Volpato CÂ; Zani IM; Bottino MA J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jan; 105(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 21194589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. An evaluation of the fit of metal-ceramic restorations made with an autoclaved silicone-based impression material. Kollefrath R; Savary M; Schwela J J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jul; 11(4):E063-70. PubMed ID: 20953566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics. Drago CJ J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 14508741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of relief space and escape holes on pressure characteristics of maxillary edentulous impressions. Komiyama O; Saeki H; Kawara M; Kobayashi K; Otake S J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):570-6. PubMed ID: 15211300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A method to make a preliminary impression of mobile teeth. Lee H; Park C J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 19573690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays. Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses. Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Defining the posterior palatal seal on a definitive impression for a maxillary complete denture by using a nonfluid wax addition technique. Wicks R; Ahuja S; Jain V J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1597-600. PubMed ID: 25258260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]