725 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27220190)
1. DEVELOPMENT OF A NEXT-GENERATION ANTIMICROBIAL WOUND DRESSING.
Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler IP
Acta Med Croatica; 2016 Mar; 70(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 27220190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A real-life clinical evaluation of a next-generation antimicrobial dressing on acute and chronic wounds.
Walker M; Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P
J Wound Care; 2015 Jan; 24(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 25543819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical safety and effectiveness evaluation of a new antimicrobial wound dressing designed to manage exudate, infection and biofilm.
Metcalf DG; Parsons D; Bowler PG
Int Wound J; 2017 Feb; 14(1):203-213. PubMed ID: 27004423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A next-generation antimicrobial wound dressing: a real-life clinical evaluation in the UK and Ireland.
Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P
J Wound Care; 2016 Mar; 25(3):132, 134-8. PubMed ID: 26947693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of a surfactant-based wound dressing on biofilm control.
Percival SL; Mayer D; Salisbury AM
Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Sep; 25(5):767-773. PubMed ID: 28857343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and in vitro performance of an antibiofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing.
Scully R; Hurlow J; Walker M; Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P
J Wound Care; 2018 Sep; 27(9):584-592. PubMed ID: 30204577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The wound-healing effects of a next-generation anti-biofilm silver Hydrofiber wound dressing on deep partial-thickness wounds using a porcine model.
Davis SC; Li J; Gil J; Valdes J; Solis M; Higa A; Bowler P
Int Wound J; 2018 Oct; 15(5):834-839. PubMed ID: 29893025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A surfactant-based wound dressing can reduce bacterial biofilms in a porcine skin explant model.
Yang Q; Larose C; Della Porta AC; Schultz GS; Gibson DJ
Int Wound J; 2017 Apr; 14(2):408-413. PubMed ID: 27212453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhanced Performance and Mode of Action of a Novel Antibiofilm Hydrofiber® Wound Dressing.
Parsons D; Meredith K; Rowlands VJ; Short D; Metcalf DG; Bowler PG
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7616471. PubMed ID: 27990437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical impact of an anti-biofilm Hydrofiber dressing in hard-to-heal wounds previously managed with traditional antimicrobial products and systemic antibiotics.
Metcalf DG; Bowler PG
Burns Trauma; 2020; 8():tkaa004. PubMed ID: 32341917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development, characterization, and evaluation of a simple polymicrobial colony biofilm model for testing of antimicrobial wound dressings.
Robertson SN; Romero M; Fenn S; Kohler Riedi PL; Cámara M
J Appl Microbiol; 2024 Mar; 135(3):. PubMed ID: 38366933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antimicrobial activity of a bioelectric dressing using an in vitro wound pathogen colony drip-flow reactor biofilm model.
Kim H; Izadjoo M
J Wound Care; 2016 Jul; 25(Sup7):S47-S52. PubMed ID: 29027847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Restoring balance: biofilms and wound dressings.
Percival SL
J Wound Care; 2018 Feb; 27(2):102-113. PubMed ID: 29424642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro prevention and inactivation of biofilms using controlled-release iodine foam dressings for wound healing.
Watson F; Chen R; Percival SL
Int Wound J; 2024 Jan; 21(1):e14365. PubMed ID: 37715349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The antimicrobial efficacy of a silver alginate dressing against a broad spectrum of clinically relevant wound isolates.
Percival SL; Slone W; Linton S; Okel T; Corum L; Thomas JG
Int Wound J; 2011 Jun; 8(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 21470369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical investigation of biofilm in non-healing wounds by high resolution microscopy techniques.
Hurlow J; Blanz E; Gaddy JA
J Wound Care; 2016 Sep; 25 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S11-22. PubMed ID: 27608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Efficacy of Tetrasodium EDTA on Biofilms.
Percival SL; Salisbury AM
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1057():101-110. PubMed ID: 29280095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel murine model for delayed wound healing using a biological wound dressing with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.
Brandenburg KS; Calderon DF; Kierski PR; Czuprynski CJ; McAnulty JF
Microb Pathog; 2018 Sep; 122():30-38. PubMed ID: 29842898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biofilm management using monofilament fibre debridement technology: outcomes and clinician and patient satisfaction.
Roes C; Calladine L; Morris C
J Wound Care; 2019 Sep; 28(9):608-622. PubMed ID: 31513491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
