These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

576 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27220855)

  • 1. A comparison of wearable fitness devices.
    Kaewkannate K; Kim S
    BMC Public Health; 2016 May; 16():433. PubMed ID: 27220855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.
    Mercer K; Giangregorio L; Schneider E; Chilana P; Li M; Grindrod K
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Jan; 4(1):e7. PubMed ID: 26818775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavior Change Techniques Present in Wearable Activity Trackers: A Critical Analysis.
    Mercer K; Li M; Giangregorio L; Burns C; Grindrod K
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Apr; 4(2):e40. PubMed ID: 27122452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?
    An HS; Jones GC; Kang SK; Welk GJ; Lee JM
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Apr; 17(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 27912681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables.
    Henriksen A; Haugen Mikalsen M; Woldaregay AZ; Muzny M; Hartvigsen G; Hopstock LA; Grimsgaard S
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e110. PubMed ID: 29567635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Usability Study of Mainstream Wearable Fitness Devices: Feature Analysis and System Usability Scale Evaluation.
    Liang J; Xian D; Liu X; Fu J; Zhang X; Tang B; Lei J
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Nov; 6(11):e11066. PubMed ID: 30409767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of Wrist-Wearable Activity Devices for Estimating Physical Activity in Adolescents: Comparative Study.
    Hao Y; Ma XK; Zhu Z; Cao ZB
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e18320. PubMed ID: 33410757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How consumer physical activity monitors could transform human physiology research.
    Wright SP; Hall Brown TS; Collier SR; Sandberg K
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2017 Mar; 312(3):R358-R367. PubMed ID: 28052867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the Validity of Current Mainstream Wearable Devices in Fitness Tracking Under Various Physical Activities: Comparative Study.
    Xie J; Wen D; Liang L; Jia Y; Gao L; Lei J
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Apr; 6(4):e94. PubMed ID: 29650506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
    Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are Currently Available Wearable Devices for Activity Tracking and Heart Rate Monitoring Accurate, Precise, and Medically Beneficial?
    El-Amrawy F; Nounou MI
    Healthc Inform Res; 2015 Oct; 21(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 26618039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers.
    Evenson KR; Goto MM; Furberg RD
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():159. PubMed ID: 26684758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of Optical Heart Rate Sensing Technology in Wearable Fitness Trackers for Young and Older Adults: Validation and Comparison Study.
    Chow HW; Yang CC
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Apr; 8(4):e14707. PubMed ID: 32343255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Social Networkout": Connecting Social Features of Wearable Fitness Trackers with Physical Exercise.
    Zhu Y; Dailey SL; Kreitzberg D; Bernhardt J
    J Health Commun; 2017 Dec; 22(12):974-980. PubMed ID: 29173072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Habit Formation in Wearable Activity Tracker Use Among Older Adults: Qualitative Study.
    Peng W; Li L; Kononova A; Cotten S; Kamp K; Bowen M
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e22488. PubMed ID: 33464216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study.
    Ferguson T; Rowlands AV; Olds T; Maher C
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey.
    Paré G; Leaver C; Bourget C
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e177. PubMed ID: 29720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and Acceptability of Wrist-Wearable Activity-Tracking Devices: Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Germini F; Noronha N; Borg Debono V; Abraham Philip B; Pete D; Navarro T; Keepanasseril A; Parpia S; de Wit K; Iorio A
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e30791. PubMed ID: 35060915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Commercial Physical Activity Trackers for Health Promotion Research: Four Case Studies.
    Turner-McGrievy G; Jake-Schoffman DE; Singletary C; Wright M; Crimarco A; Wirth MD; Shivappa N; Mandes T; West DS; Wilcox S; Drenowatz C; Hester A; McGrievy MJ
    Health Promot Pract; 2019 May; 20(3):381-389. PubMed ID: 29618233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Users' experiences of wearable activity trackers: a cross-sectional study.
    Maher C; Ryan J; Ambrosi C; Edney S
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Nov; 17(1):880. PubMed ID: 29141607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.