These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27220996)

  • 1. A unified account of categorical effects in phonetic perception.
    Kronrod Y; Coppess E; Feldman NH
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1681-1712. PubMed ID: 27220996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of categories on perception: explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference.
    Feldman NH; Griffiths TL; Morgan JL
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):752-782. PubMed ID: 19839683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distributional learning for speech reflects cumulative exposure to a talker's phonetic distributions.
    Theodore RM; Monto NR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):985-992. PubMed ID: 30604404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception.
    Diehl RL; Lotto AJ; Holt LL
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2004; 55():149-79. PubMed ID: 14744213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual adaptation of vowels generalizes across the phonology and does not require local context.
    Chládková K; Podlipský VJ; Chionidou A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):414-427. PubMed ID: 27893274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Categorical speech perception during active discrimination of consonants and vowels.
    Altmann CF; Uesaki M; Ono K; Matsuhashi M; Mima T; Fukuyama H
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Nov; 64():13-23. PubMed ID: 25220167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prosodic boundary information modulates phonetic categorization.
    Kim S; Cho T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL19-25. PubMed ID: 23862901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. More than a boundary shift: Perceptual adaptation to foreign-accented speech reshapes the internal structure of phonetic categories.
    Xie X; Theodore RM; Myers EB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):206-217. PubMed ID: 27819457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias in the perception of phonetic detail in children's speech: A comparison of categorical and continuous rating scales.
    Munson B; Schellinger SK; Edwards J
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2017; 31(1):56-79. PubMed ID: 27736242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: the role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing.
    Bonatti LL; Peña M; Nespor M; Mehler J
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Jun; 16(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 15943671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic and auditory phonetics: the adaptive design of speech sound systems.
    Diehl RL
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Mar; 363(1493):965-78. PubMed ID: 17827108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the internal structure of phonetic categories: a progress report.
    Miller JL
    Cognition; 1994; 50(1-3):271-85. PubMed ID: 8039364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When speaker identity is unavoidable: Neural processing of speaker identity cues in natural speech.
    Tuninetti A; Chládková K; Peter V; Schiller NO; Escudero P
    Brain Lang; 2017 Nov; 174():42-49. PubMed ID: 28715718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners and automatic speech recognizers.
    Junqua JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):510-24. PubMed ID: 8423266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A specialization for speech perception.
    Liberman AM; Mattingly IG
    Science; 1989 Jan; 243(4890):489-94. PubMed ID: 2643163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The quest for generalizations over consonants: asymmetries between consonants and vowels are not the by-product of acoustic differences.
    Toro JM; Shukla M; Nespor M; Endress AD
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1515-25. PubMed ID: 19064494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of category goodness of /t/ and /k/ in typical and misarticulated children's speech.
    Strömbergsson S; Salvi G; House D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3422-35. PubMed ID: 26093431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Depolarizing the perceptual magnet effect.
    Lotto AJ; Kluender KR; Holt LL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3648-55. PubMed ID: 9637046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech: measuring aftereffects after a 24-hour delay.
    Vroomen J; Baart M
    Lang Speech; 2009; 52(Pt 2-3):341-50. PubMed ID: 19624035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of phonetics within the study of language.
    Diehl RL
    Phonetica; 1991; 48(2-4):120-34. PubMed ID: 1800995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.