These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27221264)

  • 1. Measurements of central corneal thickness and endothelial parameters with three different non-contact specular microscopy devices.
    Cakici O; Karadag R; Bayramlar H; Koyun E
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 37(1):229-233. PubMed ID: 27221264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy and noncontact specular microscopy in assessing corneal endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Parisi L; Felletti M; Brusini P
    Cornea; 2011 Jul; 30(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 21150426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of central corneal thickness and endothelial cell measurements by Scheimpflug camera system and two noncontact specular microscopes.
    Karaca I; Yilmaz SG; Palamar M; Ates H
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1601-1609. PubMed ID: 28674859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Corneal endothelial cell density and pachymetry measured by contact and noncontact specular microscopy.
    Módis L; Langenbucher A; Seitz B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Oct; 28(10):1763-9. PubMed ID: 12388025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 4 specular microscopes in healthy eyes and eyes with cornea guttata or corneal grafts.
    Luft N; Hirnschall N; Schuschitz S; Draschl P; Findl O
    Cornea; 2015 Apr; 34(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 25719252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a recently developed noncontact specular microscope in comparison with conventional pachymetry devices.
    Módis L; Szalai E; Németh G; Berta A
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(5):831-8. PubMed ID: 20213610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Corneal endothelial cell analysis using two non-contact specular microscopes in healthy subjects.
    Garza-Leon M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 36(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 26438632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corneal thickness measurements with contact and noncontact specular microscopic and ultrasonic pachymetry.
    Módis L; Langenbucher A; Seitz B
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Oct; 132(4):517-21. PubMed ID: 11589873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corneal thickness and endothelial cell density measured by non-contact specular microscopy and pachymetry in Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) with laser-induced ocular hypertension.
    Ollivier FJ; Brooks DE; Komaromy AM; Kallberg ME; Andrew SE; Sapp HL; Sherwood MB; Dawson WW
    Exp Eye Res; 2003 Jun; 76(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 12742349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Smoking on Central Corneal Thickness and the Corneal Endothelial Cell Layer in Otherwise Healthy Subjects.
    Ilhan N; Ilhan O; Coskun M; Daglioglu MC; Ayhan Tuzcu E; Kahraman H; Keskin U
    Eye Contact Lens; 2016 Sep; 42(5):303-7. PubMed ID: 26618903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endothelial cells analysis with the TOPCON specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system.
    Cheung SW; Cho P
    Curr Eye Res; 2000 Oct; 21(4):788-98. PubMed ID: 11120569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal thickness and endothelial morphology in Normal Thai eyes.
    Tananuvat N; Khumchoo N
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):167. PubMed ID: 32345246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of data from the rostock cornea module of the heidelberg retina tomograph, the oculus pentacam, and the endothelial cell microscope.
    Rieth S; Engel F; Bühner E; Uhlmann S; Wiedemann P; Foja C
    Cornea; 2010 Mar; 29(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 20098314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison and evaluation of central corneal thickness using 2 new noncontact specular microscopes and conventional pachymetry devices.
    Bao F; Wang Q; Cheng S; Savini G; Lu W; Feng Y; Yu Y; Huang J
    Cornea; 2014 Jun; 33(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 24699563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of smoking on corneal endothelial cells: a cross-sectional study on a population from Isfahan, Iran.
    Golabchi K; Abtahi MA; Salehi A; Jahanbani-Ardakani H; Ghaffari S; Farajzadegan Z
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2018 Mar; 37(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 28486855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell measurements by two non-contact specular microscopes.
    Gasser L; Reinhard T; Böhringer D
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 15():87. PubMed ID: 26219961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement area and repeatability of semiautomated assessment of corneal endothelium in the Topcon specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system.
    Ding X; Huang Q; Zheng Y; Jiang Y; Huang S; He M
    Cornea; 2012 Oct; 31(10):1111-8. PubMed ID: 22902488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the corneal endothelium using noncontact and contact specular microscopy.
    Szalai E; Németh G; Berta A; Módis L
    Cornea; 2011 May; 30(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 21598434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with different non-contact devices in healthy children.
    Yalcın SO; Kaplan AT
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Dec; 40():103045. PubMed ID: 35908681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Central corneal thickness measurements with different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry.
    Tai LY; Khaw KW; Ng CM; Subrayan V
    Cornea; 2013 Jun; 32(6):766-71. PubMed ID: 23095499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.