197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27222299)
1. Estimating the risks and benefits of active surveillance protocols for prostate cancer: a microsimulation study.
de Carvalho TM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):560-566. PubMed ID: 27222299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the individual benefit of immediate treatment or active surveillance for prostate cancer after screen-detection in older (65+) men.
de Carvalho TM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
Int J Cancer; 2016 May; 138(10):2522-8. PubMed ID: 26695380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer.
Bul M; van den Bergh RC; Zhu X; Rannikko A; Vasarainen H; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1672-7. PubMed ID: 22928973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Indications for intervention during active surveillance of prostate cancer: a comparison of the Johns Hopkins and Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) protocols.
Kates M; Tosoian JJ; Trock BJ; Feng Z; Carter HB; Partin AW
BJU Int; 2015 Feb; 115(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 24904995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate cancer mortality and metastasis under different biopsy frequencies in North American active surveillance cohorts.
Lange JM; Laviana AA; Penson DF; Lin DW; Bill-Axelson A; Carlsson SV; Newcomb LF; Trock BJ; Carter HB; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Klotz LH; Etzioni RB
Cancer; 2020 Feb; 126(3):583-592. PubMed ID: 31639200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Could Differences in Treatment Between Trial Arms Explain the Reduction in Prostate Cancer Mortality in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer?
Carlsson SV; Månsson M; Moss S; Kwiatkowski M; Recker F; Tammela TLJ; Bangma C; Roobol MJ; Auvinen A; Hugosson J
Eur Urol; 2019 Jun; 75(6):1015-1022. PubMed ID: 30928162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits and harms of prostate cancer screening - predictions of the ONCOTYROL prostate cancer outcome and policy model.
Mühlberger N; Boskovic K; Krahn MD; Bremner KE; Oberaigner W; Klocker H; Horninger W; Sroczynski G; Siebert U
BMC Public Health; 2017 Jun; 17(1):596. PubMed ID: 28651567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biopsy features associated with prostate cancer progression in active surveillance patients: comparison of three statistical models.
Iremashvili V; Manoharan M; Rosenberg DL; Soloway MS
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 22564446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer screening between the ages of 55 and 69 years followed by active surveillance.
de Carvalho TM; Heijnsdijk EAM; de Koning HJ
Cancer; 2018 Feb; 124(3):507-513. PubMed ID: 29231973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Landmarks in prostate cancer screening.
Schröder FH
BJU Int; 2012 Oct; 110 Suppl 1():3-7. PubMed ID: 23046034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Analysis of Biopsy Upgrading in Four Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohorts.
Inoue LYT; Lin DW; Newcomb LF; Leonardson AS; Ankerst D; Gulati R; Carter HB; Trock BJ; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Klotz LH; Mamedov A; Penson DF; Etzioni R
Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jan; 168(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29181514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing active surveillance strategies to balance the competing goals of early detection of grade progression and minimizing harm from biopsies.
Barnett CL; Auffenberg GB; Cheng Z; Yang F; Wang J; Wei JT; Miller DC; Montie JE; Mamawala M; Denton BT
Cancer; 2018 Feb; 124(4):698-705. PubMed ID: 29131319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observational studies and the natural history of screen-detected prostate cancer.
Albertsen PC
Curr Opin Urol; 2015 May; 25(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 25692723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Active surveillance of very-low-risk prostate cancer in the setting of active treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with 5α-reductase inhibitors.
Shelton PQ; Ivanowicz AN; Wakeman CM; Rydberg MG; Norton J; Riggs SB; Teigland CM
Urology; 2013 May; 81(5):979-84. PubMed ID: 23523297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. When should active surveillance for prostate cancer stop if no progression is detected?
de Carvalho TM; Heijnsdijk EAM; de Koning HJ
Prostate; 2017 Jun; 77(9):962-969. PubMed ID: 28419541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Active surveillance can reduce overtreatment in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Thomsen FB; Røder MA; Hvarness H; Iversen P; Brasso K
Dan Med J; 2013 Feb; 60(2):A4575. PubMed ID: 23461989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How Active is Active Surveillance? Intensity of Followup during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in the United States.
Loeb S; Walter D; Curnyn C; Gold HT; Lepor H; Makarov DV
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):721-6. PubMed ID: 26946161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation and Active Treatment versus Active Surveillance of Localized Prostate Cancer in Renal Transplant Patients in the Era of Low and Very Low Risk Prostate Cancer.
Aminsharifi A; Simon R; Polascik TJ; Robertson CN; Sudan DL; Collins BH; Moul JW
J Urol; 2019 Sep; 202(3):469-474. PubMed ID: 30835631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Population based study of use and determinants of active surveillance and watchful waiting for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer.
Loeb S; Berglund A; Stattin P
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1742-9. PubMed ID: 23727309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
