These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27223256)

  • 41. Eye dominance modulates visuospatial attention.
    Schintu S; Chaumillon R; Guillaume A; Salemme R; Reilly KT; Pisella L; Farnè A
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Apr; 141():107314. PubMed ID: 31870684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Developmental trajectory of pseudoneglect in adults using the greyscales task.
    Friedrich TE; Hunter PV; Elias LJ
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Nov; 52(11):1937-1943. PubMed ID: 27598252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A leftward perceptual asymmetry when judging the attractiveness of visual patterns.
    Rodway P; Schepman A; Crossley B; Lee J
    Laterality; 2019 Jan; 24(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 29658376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The influence of stimulus proximity on judgments of spatial relationships in patients with chronic unilateral right or left hemisphere stroke.
    Williamson JB; Haque S; Burtis B; Harciarek M; Lamb D; Zilli E; Heilman KM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 25350787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effects of hemispheric dominance, literacy acquisition, and handedness on the development of visuospatial attention: A study in preschoolers and second graders.
    Rinaldi L; Di Luca S; Toneatto C; Girelli L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Jul; 195():104830. PubMed ID: 32203730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Representational pseudoneglect in an auditory-driven spatial working memory task.
    Brooks JL; Logie RH; McIntosh R; Sala SD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Nov; 64(11):2168-80. PubMed ID: 21895568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Olafson C
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Mar; 35(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 9051685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of strategy on pseudoneglect for luminance judgements.
    Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 15919185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Spatial bias induced by a non-conflictual task reveals the nature of space perception.
    Dupierrix E; Alleysson D; Ohlmann T; Chokron S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1214():127-35. PubMed ID: 18462710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The centre is not in the middle: evidence from line and word bisection.
    Arduino LS; Previtali P; Girelli L
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2140-6. PubMed ID: 20385154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The need for a revised version of the Benton judgment of line orientation test.
    Treccani B; Cubelli R
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2011 Feb; 33(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 20924915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The relationship between collisions and pseudoneglect: is it right?
    Hatin B; Sykes Tottenham L; Oriet C
    Cortex; 2012 Sep; 48(8):997-1008. PubMed ID: 21696716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Testing the activation-orientation account of spatial attentional asymmetries using transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Loftus AM; Nicholls ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Sep; 50(11):2573-6. PubMed ID: 22820341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Hemispheric dominance for visuospatial attention does not predict the direction of pseudoneglect.
    Gerrits R; Verhelst H; Vingerhoets G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107634. PubMed ID: 32998020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of lateral head inclination on multimodal spatial orientation judgments in neglect: evidence for impaired spatial orientation constancy.
    Funk J; Finke K; Müller HJ; Utz KS; Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1616-27. PubMed ID: 20138897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Which numbers do you have in mind? Number generation is influenced by reading direction.
    Göbel SM; Maier CA; Shaki S
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():241-4. PubMed ID: 26224271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Hemispheric asymmetries in categorical perception of orientation in infants and adults.
    Franklin A; Catherwood D; Alvarez J; Axelsson E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 20519136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cross-cultural effects on the assumed light source direction: evidence from English and Hebrew readers.
    Andrews B; Aisenberg D; d'Avossa G; Sapir A
    J Vis; 2013 Nov; 13(13):2. PubMed ID: 24187057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Lateral asymmetry of voluntary attention orienting.
    Castro-Barros BA; Lacerda AM; Righi LL; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2010 Aug; 43(8):745-58. PubMed ID: 20658095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Left-ear-driven representational pseudoneglect for mentally represented real-word scenes created from aural-verbal description.
    Brooks JL; Brandimonte MA
    Cogn Process; 2014 May; 15(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 24317838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.