194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27224550)
1. Methylmercury production in a chronically sulfate-impacted sub-boreal wetland.
Johnson NW; Mitchell CP; Engstrom DR; Bailey LT; Coleman Wasik JK; Berndt ME
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2016 Jun; 18(6):725-34. PubMed ID: 27224550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methylmercury and dissolved organic carbon relationships in a wetland-rich watershed impacted by elevated sulfate from mining.
Berndt ME; Bavin TK
Environ Pollut; 2012 Feb; 161():321-7. PubMed ID: 21705118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of porewater sulfide on methylmercury production and partitioning in sulfate-impacted lake sediments.
Bailey LT; Mitchell CPJ; Engstrom DR; Berndt ME; Coleman Wasik JK; Johnson NW
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Feb; 580():1197-1204. PubMed ID: 28024742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sulfate addition increases methylmercury production in an experimental wetland.
Jeremiason JD; Engstrom DR; Swain EB; Nater EA; Johnson BM; Almendinger JE; Monson BA; Kolka RK
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jun; 40(12):3800-6. PubMed ID: 16830545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methylmercury production in sediment from agricultural and non-agricultural wetlands in the Yolo Bypass, California, USA.
Marvin-DiPasquale M; Windham-Myers L; Agee JL; Kakouros E; Kieu le H; Fleck JA; Alpers CN; Stricker CA
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jun; 484():288-99. PubMed ID: 24188689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of disturbance and vegetation type on total and methylmercury in boreal peatland and forest soils.
Braaten HFV; de Wit HA
Environ Pollut; 2016 Nov; 218():140-149. PubMed ID: 27552047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mercury methylation in high and low-sulphate impacted wetland ponds within the prairie pothole region of North America.
Hoggarth CG; Hall BD; Mitchell CP
Environ Pollut; 2015 Oct; 205():269-77. PubMed ID: 26099458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methylmercury in water, sediment, and invertebrates in created wetlands of Rouge Park, Toronto, Canada.
Sinclair KA; Xie Q; Mitchell CP
Environ Pollut; 2012 Dec; 171():207-15. PubMed ID: 22940274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mercury methylation in stormwater retention ponds at different stages in the management lifecycle.
Strickman RJ; Mitchell CPJ
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Apr; 20(4):595-606. PubMed ID: 29376168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sulfate threshold target to control methylmercury levels in wetland ecosystems.
Corrales J; Naja GM; Dziuba C; Rivero RG; Orem W
Sci Total Environ; 2011 May; 409(11):2156-62. PubMed ID: 21439608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methylmercury cycling in High Arctic wetland ponds: controls on sedimentary production.
Lehnherr I; St Louis VL; Kirk JL
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Oct; 46(19):10523-31. PubMed ID: 22799567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatial and temporal variation of total mercury and methylmercury in lacustrine wetland in Korea.
Kim MK; Lee YM; Zoh KD
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 May; 22(9):6578-89. PubMed ID: 25758419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total and methylmercury concentrations in ground and surface waters in natural and restored freshwater wetlands in northern New York.
Wang T; Driscoll CT; Hwang K; Chandler D; Montesdeoca M
Ecotoxicology; 2020 Dec; 29(10):1602-1613. PubMed ID: 31974921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial and seasonal variability of dissolved methylmercury in two stream basins in the eastern United States.
Bradley PM; Burns DA; Murray KR; Brigham ME; Button DT; Chasar LC; Marvin-Dipasquale M; Lowery MA; Journey CA
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2048-55. PubMed ID: 21341694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aeshnid dragonfly larvae as bioindicators of methylmercury contamination in aquatic systems impacted by elevated sulfate loading.
Jeremiason JD; Reiser TK; Weitz RA; Berndt ME; Aiken GR
Ecotoxicology; 2016 Apr; 25(3):456-68. PubMed ID: 26738880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methylmercury cycling in High Arctic wetland ponds: sources and sinks.
Lehnherr I; St Louis VL; Emmerton CA; Barker JD; Kirk JL
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Oct; 46(19):10514-22. PubMed ID: 22779785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mercury methylation and methylmercury demethylation in boreal lake sediment with legacy sulphate pollution.
Huang H; Mangal V; Rennie MD; Tong H; Simpson MJ; Mitchell CPJ
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2022 Jun; 24(6):932-944. PubMed ID: 35532885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sources of methylmercury to a wetland-dominated lake in northern Wisconsin.
Watras CJ; Morrison KA; Kent A; Price N; Regnell O; Eckley C; Hintelmann H; Hubacher T
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Jul; 39(13):4747-58. PubMed ID: 16053072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Distribution Characteristics of Mercury in Different Urban Constructed Wetlands].
Fan YF; Liu WH; Sun T; Yuan M; Lü DW; Li XY; Wang YM; Wang DY
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2019 May; 40(5):2226-2233. PubMed ID: 31087860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wetlands as principal zones of methylmercury production in southern Louisiana and the Gulf of Mexico region.
Hall BD; Aiken GR; Krabbenhoft DP; Marvin-Dipasquale M; Swarzenski CM
Environ Pollut; 2008 Jul; 154(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 18242808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
