These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Geneticists and sex selection. Kaye CI; La Puma J Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):40-1. PubMed ID: 2211088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical aspects of prenatal diagnosis: views of U.S. medical geneticists. Fletcher JC; Wertz DC Clin Perinatol; 1987 Jun; 14(2):293-312. PubMed ID: 3297466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal privacy and confidentiality. Botkin JR Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(5):32-9. PubMed ID: 8530268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prenatal screening: professional standards and the limits of parental choice. Botkin JR Obstet Gynecol; 1990 May; 75(5):875-80. PubMed ID: 2109295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethics and medical genetics in the United States: a national survey. Wertz DC; Fletcher JC Am J Med Genet; 1988 Apr; 29(4):815-27. PubMed ID: 3400726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prenatal genetic screening: the enigma of selective abortion. Stoller D J Law Health; 1997-1998; 12(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 10182027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prenatal diagnosis and female abortion: a case study in medical law and ethics. Dickens BM J Med Ethics; 1986 Sep; 12(3):143-4, 150. PubMed ID: 3761335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Legalization of prenatal determination of the sex of the fetus]. Czeizel E Orv Hetil; 1989 Mar; 130(10):541. PubMed ID: 2726235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The legal implications of refusing to provide prenatal diagnosis in low-risk pregnancies or solely for sex selection. Wright EE Am J Med Genet; 1980; 5(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 7395919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethics and the commercial use of genetics. Arda B Bull Med Ethics; 1995 Sep; No. 111():19-22. PubMed ID: 11654272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex selection. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 177. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Ethics ACOG Comm Opin; 1996 Nov; No. 177():4 p. PubMed ID: 11660573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Provider biases and choices: the role of gender. Wertz DC Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 36(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 8403603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Examining the pros and cons of parental responsibility for genetic health. Twiss SB Hastings Cent Rep; 1974 Feb; 4(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 4529240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical aspects of medical genetics. A proposal for guidelines in genetic counseling, prenatal diagnosis and screening. Fletcher JC; Berg K; Tranøy KE Clin Genet; 1985 Feb; 27(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 3978857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Society and the not-so-new genetics: what are we afraid of? Some future predictions from a social scientist. Wertz DC J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1997; 13(2):299-345. PubMed ID: 9212521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sex selective eugenic abortion: prospects in China and India. Moen E Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):231-49. PubMed ID: 11651218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prenatal diagnosis and sex selection in 19 nations. Wertz DC; Fletcher JC Soc Sci Med; 1993 Dec; 37(11):1359-66. PubMed ID: 8284703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A sense of autonomy is preserved under Chinese reproductive policies. Su B; Macer DR New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 16552915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]