These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27224927)

  • 1. Efficacy and pregnancy outcomes of laparoscopic single sheet mesh sacrohysteropexy.
    Pandeva I; Mistry M; Fayyad A
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Mar; 36(3):787-793. PubMed ID: 27224927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
    Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and one year outcomes following vaginally assisted laparoscopic uterine sacropexy (VALUES) for advanced uterine prolapse.
    Fayyad AM; Siozos CS
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2014 Mar; 33(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 23729356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy.
    Daniels S; Robson D; Palacz M; Howell S; Nguyen T; Behnia-Willison F
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 60(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 31840811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial).
    van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden A; Veen J; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Housmans S; van Kuijk S; Deprest J; Bongers MY; van Eijndhoven H
    BJOG; 2020 Sep; 127(10):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 32267624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing uterine preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh versus laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse.
    Doğan O; Yassa M; Eren E; Birol İlter P; Tuğ N
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Jun; 297():120-125. PubMed ID: 38608354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol).
    van IJsselmuiden MN; Coolen AL; Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Bongers M; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Deprest J; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMC Womens Health; 2014 Sep; 14():112. PubMed ID: 25231240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension: 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    Izett-Kay ML; Rahmanou P; Cartwright RJ; Price N; Jackson SR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1957-1965. PubMed ID: 34424347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Meshless Practical Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy Modification and Long-term Outcomes.
    Orhan A; Ozerkan K; Kasapoglu I; Ocakoglu G; Aslan K; Uncu G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1573-1580. PubMed ID: 32135244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic wrap round mesh sacrohysteropexy for the management of apical prolapse.
    Kupelian AS; Vashisht A; Sambandan N; Cutner A
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1889-1897. PubMed ID: 27250829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy in a Woman at 12 Weeks' Gestation.
    Haliloglu Peker B; Ilter E; Peker H; Celik A; Gursoy A; Gunaldi O
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1146-1147. PubMed ID: 29447856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy as treatment for uterine descent: comparison of long-term outcomes.
    van Oudheusden AMJ; Coolen AWM; Hoskam H; Veen J; Bongers MY
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):211-223. PubMed ID: 35482083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Yan L; Lu S; Zhao C; Lei L; Liu L
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 30(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 36563872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of patient reported outcomes, pelvic floor function and recurrence after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with McCall suspension for advanced uterine prolapse.
    Şükür YE; Dökmeci F; Çetinkaya ŞE; Seval MM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():127-131. PubMed ID: 32092668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medium-term anatomic and functional results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy beyond the learning curve.
    Claerhout F; De Ridder D; Roovers JP; Rommens H; Spelzini F; Vandenbroucke V; Coremans G; Deprest J
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1459-67. PubMed ID: 19111382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Suture Sacrohysteropexy: LUSSH Procedure.
    Jan H; Ghai V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):356-357. PubMed ID: 29631010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to anterior abdominal wall bilaterally using synthetic mesh to treat uterovaginal prolapse.
    Chen G; Ling B; Li J; Xu P; Hu W; Zhao W; Wu D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):631-6. PubMed ID: 20598651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse.
    Price N; Slack A; Jackson SR
    BJOG; 2010 Jan; 117(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 20002370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension combined with cervical amputation in treatment of women severe uterine prolapsed at child-bearing period].
    Sun Z; Zhu L; Hu H; Lang J; Shi H; Gong X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 49(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 24820298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vaginal cystocele repair and hysteropexy in women with anterior and central compartment prolapse: efficacy and safety after 30 months of follow-up.
    Serati M; Braga A; Cantaluppi S; Caccia G; Ghezzi F; Sorice P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):831-836. PubMed ID: 29064031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.