362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27225144)
1. Assessment of Gender Dimorphism on Sagittal Cephalometry in Pakistani Population.
Qamruddin I; Alam MK; Shahid F; Tanveer S; Mukhtiar M; Asim Z
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 May; 26(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 27225144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships.
Hurmerinta K; Rahkamo A; Haavikko K
Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Sagittal Plane among Saudi Orthodontic Patients.
Al-Hamlan N; Al-Eissa B; Al-Hiyasat AS; Albalawi FS; Ahmed AE
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 26162253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Occlusal status and prevalence of occlusal malocclusion traits among 9-year-old schoolchildren.
Lux CJ; Dücker B; Pritsch M; Komposch G; Niekusch U
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):294-9. PubMed ID: 19244457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern.
Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):75-81. PubMed ID: 30427496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The wits appraisal using three reference planes and its interaction with the ANB angle among a sub-set of Nigerians".
Ifesanya JU; Adeyemi AT; Otuyemi OD
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2014 Sep; 43(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 26223140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships.
Zupancic S; Pohar M; Farcnik F; Ovsenik M
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 18540015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relation between centric slide and Angle's classification.
Afzal A; Qamruddin I
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Aug; 15(8):481-4. PubMed ID: 16202359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns.
Rodriguez-Cardenas YA; Arriola-Guillen LE; Flores-Mir C
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):46-53. PubMed ID: 25628079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Properties of the ANB angle and the Wits appraisal in the skeletal estimation of Angle's Class III patients.
Iwasaki H; Ishikawa H; Chowdhury L; Nakamura S; Iida J
Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 12407943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of different cephalometric analyses in the diagnosis of class III malocclusion in Saudi and Yemeni population.
Alassiry AM
J Orthod Sci; 2020; 9():14. PubMed ID: 33354540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Floating norms for individualising the ANB angle and the WITS appraisal in orthodontic cephalometric analysis based on guiding variables.
Paddenberg E; Proff P; Kirschneck C
J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jan; 84(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 34255093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of Wits appraisal with superimposition method].
Xu T; Ahn J; Baumrind S
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 34(4):211-3. PubMed ID: 11776907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the YEN angle.
Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19582259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of dentoalveolar compensation in skeletal class II malocclusion in a Pakistani University Hospital setting.
Anwar N; Fida M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Jan; 19(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 19149973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence of astigmatism in a paediatric population with malocclusions.
Monaco A; Spadaro A; Sgolastra F; Petrucci A; D'Andrea PD; Gatto R
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2011 Jun; 12(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 21668278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle.
Baik CY; Ververidou M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15224065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new approach of assessing sagittal dysplasia: the W angle.
Bhad WA; Nayak S; Doshi UH
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 21303811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An investigation of cervicovertebral morphology in different sagittal skeletal growth patterns.
Baydaş B; Yavuz I; Durna N; Ceylan I
Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 14994881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
