These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27225635)

  • 1. Implicitly learned suppression of irrelevant spatial locations.
    Leber AB; Gwinn RE; Hong Y; O'Toole RJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1873-1881. PubMed ID: 27225635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):860-870. PubMed ID: 29476331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.
    van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA
    J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
    Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression.
    Jagini KK; Sunny MM
    Cortex; 2023 Apr; 161():77-92. PubMed ID: 36913824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
    Huang C; Vilotijević A; Theeuwes J; Donk M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33620698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proactively location-based suppression elicited by statistical learning.
    Kong S; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233544. PubMed ID: 32479531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Failing M; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learned spatial suppression is not always proactive.
    Chang S; Dube B; Golomb JD; Leber AB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1031-1041. PubMed ID: 37199949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymmetric learning of dynamic spatial regularities in visual search: Robust facilitation of predictable target locations, fragile suppression of distractor locations.
    Yu H; Allenmark F; Müller HJ; Shi Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 May; 49(5):709-724. PubMed ID: 37261775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.
    Gaspelin N; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1740-50. PubMed ID: 26420441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strategic Distractor Suppression Improves Selective Control in Human Vision.
    van Zoest W; Huber-Huber C; Weaver MD; Hickey C
    J Neurosci; 2021 Aug; 41(33):7120-7135. PubMed ID: 34244360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decomposing experience-driven attention: Opposite attentional effects of previously predictive cues.
    Lin Z; Lu ZL; He S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2185-98. PubMed ID: 27068051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implicit learning of a speed-contingent target feature.
    Hwang BW; Kim MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Jun; 23(3):803-8. PubMed ID: 26585117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do salient abrupt onsets trigger suppression?
    Burgess E; Hauck C; De Pooter E; Ruthruff E; Lien MC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):634-648. PubMed ID: 36207664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interaction between scene-based and array-based contextual cueing.
    Rosenbaum GM; Jiang YV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):888-99. PubMed ID: 23572204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Awareness in contextual cueing of visual search as measured with concurrent access- and phenomenal-consciousness tasks.
    Schlagbauer B; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M; Geyer T
    J Vis; 2012 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 23104818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.