These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression. Wang B; Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):860-870. PubMed ID: 29476331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms. van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering. Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression. Jagini KK; Sunny MM Cortex; 2023 Apr; 161():77-92. PubMed ID: 36913824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proactively location-based suppression elicited by statistical learning. Kong S; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233544. PubMed ID: 32479531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect. Xu B; Tanaka JW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture. Failing M; Theeuwes J Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]